Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cirrus who wrote (960)	12/23/2004 1:05:42 AM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 224668

I believe you misunderstood me. You thought it was "contradictory" (or rather it would have been redundant) for the planes to carry both explosives and missiles. I mentioned that there was belief that the planes fired missiles before crashing into the WTCs and photos purporting that this incident occurred were posted. I suggested that the plane that crashed somewhere in PA probably carried high explosives because its crash and attendant explosion caused a seismometer many miles away to register a significant reading of >2. Whereas the seismometer readings for the two earlier explosions in New York were relatively low and not as significant. Oh well, it may be the nature of the ground in New York state dissipated the energy of the crashes and/or explosions so much more effectively that nearby seismometers registered low and insignificant readings.