Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter michaelson who wrote (1184)	12/22/2004 7:22:13 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 5425

Oy, a great point about the judicial system: "I think it's a fair trial, which anyone with a million dollars to invest in their defense can get in the United States." We're happy to serve you justice in any desired quality and quantity, shape and size. How much justice would you be liking to afford today? <g>

To: peter michaelson who wrote (1184)	12/22/2004 11:27:31 PM
From: jessie73	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Peter the Jury can weight all the evidence, but we can evaluate parts of it. Based upon the evidence so far, and the defense so far, its clear to almost anyone, that Extortion occured with NSOL. You were involved with working with Elgindy during NSOL, and you traded the stock, and bought the cheap shares from Elgindy. I don't expect you to comment. But if you were not involved with NSOL personally it would be clear to you, as it is to the rest. You are not unbiased on NSOL, would you agree on that? Chatlog - December 20, 2001 [12:34] peter>> when are you gonna rip NSOL apart again Tony? you just gonna let him stew for a while? [12:34] anthony>> yes peter [12:34] anthony>> i want to let him think he is safe