Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1192)	12/23/2004 2:59:28 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

That's it?! Sheesh. I'll go back to reading Proust now. "the document in question was the AZNT complaint against me, Janice, etc. "

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1192)	12/23/2004 8:57:32 AM
From: Louie_al-Arouri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Jeff, lucky girl may also be clueless to all the malicious and meritless lawsuits you and the webfraud3 participated in and contributed to. So save the "she wouldn't understand". Everyone knows who took money to assist whom in suing investors of a company that you assisted Wolfson's Operation Uptick and Bermuda Short racketeers to manipulate. If you need a refresher, pull up Bill's magenticdiary postings from the webfraud3 communiques with Carmine Bua (Jordan Capital & WellRich, the house that offered AZNT to the public) and your communique's with Bruce Judd, attorney of fugitive and racketeer Andy Mann. Who are you to keep demanding from posters their "reason" for posting? What's it to you? The problem with the webfraud3 and their contingency is that you are all unable to debate the issues on topic on this board. You've all chosen, as usual, to intimidate the posters that are problematic to your defense of Tony and his acts against companies and investors. You've already decided that lucky_girl and I know each other and have joined forces somehow. It's not true of course. It's all more webfraud3 "theory", but it doesn't matter. The webfraud3 can speculate. It's SI. This is why you were sued for fraud. You're imo dangerous. You speculate. When called on it you always resort to, "it was a joke". In retrospect, the AZNT suit was just another house stock brought public to manipulate. In this case, some heavy hitters were behind it. The CEO duped shareholders and was sued for his actions. He also tried to dupe the racketeers who took AZNT public to manipulate. In turn, the racketeers duped you into assisting them. You did so and you did so willingly. imo, you enjoyed it. IMO, you still do. I think lucky_girl can see that much. The proof is members of your faction assisting in other markets involving Wolfson and Surber like TEVT. (See TEVT's last 10KSB - "legal proceedings", also, stockupticks.com's stock promotions)

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1192)	12/28/2004 10:17:44 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 5425

So what you see here are two competing sentiments: 1) Lucky_Girl is clueless and I don't have time to explain things to her because the end result will just be a never-ending series of follow-up questions and who needs that. And 2) Lucky_Girl is just pretending to be clueless as an excuse to waste our time and/or manufacture smoke to give the illusion of fire by bringing up old and discarded information as if it were breaking news. I'd say Door Number 2. I find it hard to believe that anyone could be as stupid as LG seems to be.