SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (91982)12/23/2004 7:15:10 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793838
 
Is there NO WAY, WE THE PEOPLE cannot REVOKE their license? jdn

It's first amendment "freedom of the press," JDN. I don't want to lose that.

Grin and bear it.



To: JDN who wrote (91982)12/23/2004 7:33:40 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
stop reading nytimes, stop buying the paper, let advertisers know you will not buy their product if they buy ads in nytimes.

freedom of choice is ok with nytimes but if they do not make a profit i am sure stockholders will take notice and pressure to change their style. Of course this goes to other papers owned by nytimes like boston globe...

Now these papers are published in large democrat blue states , so they may not get a big drop in circulation.. Besides most read the sports page vs editorial pages. g

ps latimes circulation is way off. others must be tired of it. I dropped the philadelphia inquirer last year , much too liberal and their editorial pages became front page so called news. Of course we have another newspaper in a liberal city that is about 98% democrat.

I rely on web, and fox for my news.