6/20/01: Jeffrey S Mitchell, aka William Lee Secrest, sends me unsolicited email. ALL my email is CC:'d to the federal agents I am in contact with.
* RECENT ADDITIONS & LINKS TO 'PERMEATING THE CYBER MEMBRANE'
Newest Additions:
6/20/01: Jeffrey S Mitchell, aka William Lee Secrest, sends me unsolicited email. ALL my email is CC:'d to the federal agents I am in contact with. Mitchell added a new name, other than Mendelson who defended him when he, Janice Evans aka Janice Shell, & William Ulrich were sued for fraud by Business Wire (new name in red).
I certainly hope none of the email exchanges between Mitchell and this new name that he added to my CC: list are ever deleted or destroyed. I requested that they not be.:
From: jmitchel@optonline.net (Jeff Mitchell)
To: XXXX.XXXX@usdoj.gov, XXXXXX@sec.gov, XXXXX@sec.gov, XXXXXLAW@aol.com, PugsTKO@aol.com
CC: XXXXXX@aol.com, DArgentar@XXXX-XXXX.net
*excerpt
"...Also, for the record, I've never ever to my knowledge had any dealings with
"Deak-Perera Capital Mkts, Amerivet aka
AccessTradeOne Commodities."
- Jeff Mitchell
I also requested that WLS 890AM, in Chicago, remove the link for my web-site from their homepage that allowed WLS listeners to veiw Jay Marvin's fantastic works of art and read his prose because Jeffrey S Mitchell's, Robert Zumbrunnen's and Janice Evans', aka Janice Shell's, acts of terrorism now include terrorist acts against a member of the press, WLS talk-host, Jay Marvin.
Message 18287911
The continuing saga – Part 17
Reformatted for easier reading – errors in the ‘original’ have not been corrected.
Message 18159408
Q This document on the top of it, exhibit 13 says permeating the cyber membrane into the new world order by Gary Dobry, correct?
A Correct.
Q And insofar as this document contains material from other sources, you are the one who assembled and put them in -- on to your web site, correct?
A To -- again, I defer to the caveat that Mr. Richter said because I haven't looked at these 67 pages. You know, my web site I did. I don't know if it's been hacked into in the meantime or what's go gone on in the meantime because what's the date today.
Q The 29th of March?
A Yeah, I haven't looked at it since then. I don't know if it was hacked. I don't believe it was. Was I was on my come pewter yesterday but there was no alarm on my fire walls I have to defer to what Mr. Richter just said.
BY MR. ARGENTAR:
Q To your knowledge, permeating the cyber membrane into the new world order, that document is still accessible on your web site?
A Yeah, the one that I wrote is accessible, yes.
Q So -- strike that. Can you tell me what this document is?
A Sure. It's research I'm doing on stock manipulation through the Internet.
Q What is the subject of the document?
A Organized crime manipulating stocks via the worldwide web.
Q Does it deal with terrorism, drug dealing, things of that nature? Is that referred to in this document?
A Maybe you could point out to me where you're talking about them and I will let you know if it is or not.
Q Sure.
A Sure.
Q Looking at page 65 of 67, for example?
A 65. Hold on. 62. 64. 65. Okay.
Q The last paragraph on that page says, Somewhere deep in the mire of the OTC cesspool, free shares bought, with dirty, drug and/or taxable money, finance the New World Order. Is that a reference to drug money?
4 A That's exactly what it says, Mr. Argentar.
Q I'm asking you what it says.
A It says, Somewhere deep in the mire of the OTC cesspool free shares, bought with dirty, drug and/or taxable money, finance the new world order.
Q And this -- this document sets forth your -- your theory or understanding of -- of organized crime as it relates to the over-the-counter stock market?
MR. RICHTER: I object to the ambiguity of the question. Are you still referring to page 65 or are you referring to the whole document?
MR. ARGENTAR: I'm referring to the whole document, permeating the cyber membrane into the new world order.
THE WITNESS: I think you would be hard pressed to convince anybody that there's no organized crime in the stock market.
Q Okay?
A So I don't understand your -- your question -- can you read back his last question?
(Record read as requested.)
THE WITNESS: Maybe you could tell me the theory that you think I'm saying. What theory are you mentioning.
MR. RICHTER: Mr. Dobry, if you don't understand a question you can ask him.
THE WITNESS: That's what I'm asking.
MR. RICHTER: So you don't understand. |
