Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (1238)	12/24/2004 11:10:52 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

You can find it all here...remember that those you refer to as " mitchell, shell, et als." comprise many people who know Dobry all too well. Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases Subject 52306 Ask Dobry yourself why the "foreign medical gratuate with a degree from the Sorbonne" and who claims to have been a licensed Physician Assistant in IL has never had a medical licesnse of any kind. Ask him why he claimed to be a "Golden Gloves" amateur boxing champion but fought only 5 or 6 losing fights according to the ABA office in Chicago. Ask him why he really lied about his age... He's a nasty piece of work who'll lie about anything, anytime, anywhere. The deposition of Gary Dobry In re: Marchese vs. Dobry DATE: March 29, 2002 Message 18150629 MR. RICHTER: As you know, the witness is 44 years old. "Golden Gloves is in Feb, NationaLS in March...thats' my goal. I turn 32 in 2 wks. You can fight amateur 'til your 34,...' ...said Dobry To:SuperDave who wrote (11399) From: Pugs Saturday, Nov 1, 1997 11:25 PM Respond to 11402 of 55353 Actually superdave, I train pros, but I still fight amateur (USABF), I'm trying one more year to win National Golden Gloves and the US Championships....this little thing called Medical school kinda screwed things up ..... I tell ALL my fighters, unless you win the big amateur titles like the ones i mentioned, stay amateur, stay in school, you lose a couple of fights and you join the bum of the month club, padding other guys records. As an amateur, you can fight every week-end if you want, club fights, tourneys, etc..... Golden Gloves is in Feb, NationaLS in March...thats' my goal. I turn 32 in 2 wks. You can fight amateur 'til your 34, my girl wants me to quit NOW!!!, Pugs Message 2615580

To: rrufff who wrote (1238)	12/24/2004 12:20:47 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

rrufff, you seem to like to set yourself as an arbiter, as if unless someone has convinced you of something it's just meaningless babble. Because you are doing this to a group of people who are discussing life experiences, not some theoretical research, that's just pompous. But, because we know you thrive on self-importance, I'll give you an assignment and bow to your esteemed judgment on the issue. The question should be a simple one for you to prove or disprove. "Louie", and to some degree "Lucky", seem to amuse themselves with Googling legal documents that contain the names of people who post on this board. Your job is to find only one charge that has ever stuck, i.e. that via a jury verdict, judge decree, or settlement was ever determined or admitted. Please confine your research to things germaine to SI. If, perchance, you find someone was convicted of jaywalking or some other crime that would be construed as violating the SI Terms of Use, please refrain from posting it. To make things even easier, here is a link to a press release detailing how Gary Dobry admitted to libel in a court of law. Therefore, would you deem it an accurate statement to say Gary Dobry is an admitted libeler? findarticles.com It's very important to note that when someone is accused of a crime, legally, you can say someone is an accused whatever or that they were sued for whatever. However, to call some an accused whatever or say they were sued for whatever when said lawsuit was dismissed and the charges dropped is libelous, because, as you know, anyone can sue anyone for anything, so implying something has potential basis in fact when in fact it was proven otherwise in a court of law is libel. - Jeff

To: rrufff who wrote (1238)	12/26/2004 4:04:13 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Hello rrufff, You're asking, essentially in scope, "tell me all I want to know about the Boer War, in one or two minutes whilst I'm on this elevator." Can't be done. Condensing approximately 2000 days of posts into even 1/10th of 1% would still leave you with 2 days of reading time. If you truly want to understand the where it's at and what has transpired, your best bet is to narrowly focus some questions, get a specific starting point. I'll give you a quick "Cliff's Notes" start, you can progress from there. By the time AZNT rolled around, RMIL had already been promoted by Pugs as a "short squeeze rocket". If you don't count some minor issues like products and financing that never materialized (and were never meant to because they didn't exist), and if you ignore getting shut down by the SEC, it was a reasonable play. Pugs moved onto AZNT and was so certain that it'd be another "short squeeze rocket" that he intended to bait Janice, et. al. into it. That it suffered the same fate of the same minor issues of products and financing that never materialized (again, because they never existed), and also the same fate of getting shut down by the SEC is merely insignificant. There's a quickie two-paragraph start, for ya. Where and what do you really want to understand from there? "A serious question - Is there some place where a novice can get some fairly brief summaries and I mean brief re the pugs v mitchell, shell, et als. wars? I'd like to understand both sides. It seems quite fascinating but I don't have the time to read pages and pages of posts and often skip the longer ones here"