Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (154793)	12/26/2004 5:28:13 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Re: "You refuse to accept that the Constitution has no reference to presidential lies" No, I didn't refuse to accept any such thing, literally. I KNOW I left that open, so far as, literally, "mention" goes. The Constitution has legal bearing upon the unmentioned. That's a fact. This issue is no exception. Each new case as time marches on is subject to the rule of the Constitution, i.e. the Spirit of the Law(so that what is right can win in the end). Yes, High Crimes and Misdemeanors ought include a direct wrongful action against a citizen of this country, in a case like Clinton's (here, many times over), IMO. If it is "American" to finally do what is right by the people(and even the worlds people), as I view it(for your information), then what Clinton publicly and extravagantly did(replete with conspiracy theories) to defile these reputations has to be seriously wrong and considered, plainly, as UnAmerican. Don't 'cha think? Even a little bit? Just checking. Dan B.