Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1260)	12/26/2004 3:25:08 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 5425

No, I was answering a question for rrufff and you (once again) interrupted with your usual, erroneous Area 51 flying stock market saucers. "You have succeeded in getting the thread totally off topic though." Your definition of "aiding & abetting" is whacked. You were aiding & abetting Sylver, pumping his stock to suckers, same as you did pumping Breton's stock to suckers. And Raabe's stock.... That I posted documentation proving you wrong is why you have a chip on your shoulder now. "Bill, you were aiding & abetting racketeers. What don't you get?" A real boxer would know where in the ring his opponent sits. But you're too afraid to "box" Breton, Raabe, or Sylver, the guys who repeatedly took away your lunch money on the playground. It's hilarious, in particular, that you call Sylver a genius; the guy who asks on the witness stand, "Cash flow? That's an accounting term, right?" Sylver was incredibly stupid, and ... stupid as he was ... he still managed to dupe you. Where's that put you in the food chain, kiddo? <g>