Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:00:40 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Dobry crawls..."I MADE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MICHAEL ZWEBNER INCLUDING FALSE AND DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS IN RELATION TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH DCI AND HIS ALLEGED "SHORTING OF DCI STOCK AND HIS BANKRUPTCY". THIS ANNOUNCEMENT APPEARS AS A MATTER OF RECORD. IN THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER THROUGH DECEMBER 1998, I GARY DOBRY USING THE ALIASES "PUGS" and "SPIDER VALDEZ" POSTED ON SILICON INVESTOR CHAT LINES, AND CREATED A NEW CHAT LINE WHICH I CALLED "NO BASH FOR LEGACY." I MADE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MICHAEL ZWEBNER INCLUDING FALSE AND DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS IN RELATION TO HIS ASSOCIATION WITH DCI AND HIS ALLEGED "SHORTING OF DCI STOCK AND HIS BANKRUPTCY". I WISH NOW TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT. I NOW TOTALLY AND ABSOLUTELY APOLOGIZE TO MICHAEL ZWEBNER AND HIS FAMILY FOR ALL THE PAIN AND SUFFERING AND PUBLIC HUMILIATION I CAUSED HIM. I FURTHER STATE THAT I WAS WHOLLY MISLED BY THIRD PARTIES IN THE DISSEMINATION OF THIS FALSE INFORMATION, AND I CAME TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE PROMOTERS AND DIRECTORS OF DCI FALSELY CLAIMED THAT THE CONTINUING FALL IN THE DCI STOCK PRICE WAS A RESULT OF MICHAEL ZWEBNER'S SUPPOSED SHORT SELLING. TO MY EMBARRASSMENT I LATER LEARNED THAT WAS UNTRUE. I FURTHER INFORM YOU ALL THAT THE LAWSUIT FILED BY MR. ZWEBNER AGAINST ME HAS BEEN SETTLED. I, GARY DOBRY HAVE CONSENTED TO A SETTLEMENT JUDGMENT BEING ENTERED AGAINST ME FOR THE AMOUNT OF ONE MILLION DOLLARS IN FAVOR OF MICHAEL ZWEBNER. MR. ZWEBNER HAS AGREED NOT TO ENFORCE THE JUDGMENT FOR SO LONG AS I DO NOT ATTACK HIM OR HIS BUSINESSES FURTHER. WE HAVE ALSO AGREED TO SIGN A MUTUAL RELEASE. I REGRET HAVING BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS EPISODE. GARY DOBRY Michael Zwebner, in a statement made today, said, "This case was a libel case against me and against Legacy Software, Inc., now known as Talk Visual Corporation. I am pleased that this litigation is over. I feel vindicated in as much that these posters have come clean and have admitted their false and libelous actions. My family, and my business associates, as well as myself are relieved that all these false, malicious and libelous statements have been exposed for what they are, namely, FALSE, MALICIOUS AND LIBELOUS. The closure of this case, as well as the action taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission against DCI, Joseph Murphy, and others, is a very clear, loud and emphatic statement. It confirms to the public at large the real true facts, the truth, as I have always claimed it to be." findarticles.com

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:07:47 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

"Meanwhile, while I'm making a living and actually creating stuff to GET CRITIQUED, the ringleader is here PRETENDING I'm here. Well, RB know's I don't post, the SEC & the feds know I don't post, and soon the court will know. Contunie the charade that I am posting, but leave my work out of it!",/i> By: King_Odie $$$ 01 Dec 2000, 10:48 AM EST Msg. 85811 of 169613 It's come to my attention that my some of my work was critiqued by the resident ringleader as "simplistic" & "superficial". I recommend that the ringleader & all of you, for that matter, join the living. There are REAL Art Historians, doing REAL research everyday, you folks just wouldn't know that because you have no interaction with the real world. A "real" critique, by someone with credentials and no MOTIVES, reads like this; "...Speaking of murder, Gary Dobry's writing, "Murdering Christ (and the Death Penalty in USA Y2K)," pleads: Every time a self-proclaimed Christain advocates murder of the poor and "meek" in America for their crimes against society, I feel the jaundice stare of Judas and his kiss of death. In his irreverant second article, "Murder and the Intellectuals," Dobry takes a swipe at the gullible intellectual by taking by comparing Sartre's championing of Genet to Mailer's lionizing of Jack Henry Abbott, reminding us that some "cons" do "con." Writes Dobry: What Abbott needed was an "intellectual"! Abbott needed someone to "meddle" outside their own "area of expertise," like Sartre did with Genet to get Abbott out of prison. It was Abbott who started writing to Mailer, and it was Mailer, Mailer the intellectual, that was conned by Abbott. There's a reason they're called "cons" you know. But, there is also a reason guys like Mailer are called "intellectuals" too! The guy off the street would've been too hip to fall for Abbott's game, but not an intellectual! Abbott, in my opinion, knew exactly who he was writing and for what reason: to get out of prison! ..." Meanwhile, while I'm making a living and actually creating stuff to GET CRITIQUED, the ringleader is here PRETENDING I'm here. Well, RB know's I don't post, the SEC & the feds know I don't post, and soon the court will know. Contunie the charade that I am posting, but leave my work out of it! ragingbull.lycos.com

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:11:11 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

Dobry, not posting, again, "Pretend I am posting, but understand this board is monitored by the SEC, the FBI and RB rec'd CC:'s to their corresponces regarding my not posting." By: King_Odie $$$ 01 Dec 2000, 11:05 AM EST Msg. 85822 of 169613 (This msg. is a reply to 85814 by janice456.) I'll post to you this once, not as a victim of yours, but as an Artist. The Art Historian who critiqued & PUBLISHED my articles btw, speciality, forte', is prison. He gave it a favorable review and UNDERSTOOD it. It isn't "my" reading Dr. Shell, with all respect , it is yours. We share NO EQUALITY. You cannot "agree" with someone who has POWER over you. In this area, I have POWER, ie, more KNOWLEDGE, than you. In fact, you embarass yourself and sink even lower by playing to the house. "My" house, is REAL ART HISTORIANS. I make my living, unlike you in that world. That world NEVER HEARD OF YOU. In that world, MY OPINION means more than yours. So, in saying that, You may sense how worthless your opinion is, add to that your motives. Pretend I am posting, but understand this board is monitored by the SEC, the FBI and RB rec'd CC:'s to their corresponces regarding my not posting. Get better at your "area of expertise" and leave art to artists, ok Dr. Shell? EOD ragingbull.lycos.com

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:12:11 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

Dobry...have you been tugging on your hairplugs again? Tut, tut...

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:36:47 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

You are correct that my client has not obtained a court order authorizing the subpoena in accordance with Doe v. 2TheMart.com Inc. Accordingly, the subpoena issued by my client on January 10, 2002, is hereby withdrawn. lol, this is Richter's letter. I'm sure you'll be amused by the way he phrased it: Here's the text of Richter's letter: Mr. Brent Snyder Perkins Coie, LLP 1201 Third Avenue Suit 4800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3099 RE: DOBRY v. MARCHESE Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter will acknowledge receipt of your letter and your objection to subpoena, both dated January 23, 2002. You are correct that my client has not obtained a court order authorizing the subpoena in accordance with Doe v. 2TheMart.com Inc. Accordingly, the subpoena issued by my client on January 10, 2002, is hereby withdrawn. Should my client decide to proceed further in this matter I will advice [sic] you of any steps which we take. Very truly yours, Tobin M. Richter TMR/Id cc (via fax): Mr. Don Johnson Mr. Gary Dobry Message 17009671

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1277)	12/27/2004 10:49:26 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

"I saw no mention of the AZNT short position, the DTC freeze of AZNT 's account to halt the stolen stock from being transfered and the short against it naked or the federal case against Mann & the firms that hypothecated the stolen stock." ... Gary AZNT SHAREHOLDER 14 Jun 2001, 02:29 PM EDT Msg. 119128 of 156427 (This msg. is a reply to 119127 by yardslave.) From: PugsTKO@aol.com Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:59:17 EST Re: AZNT To: Jason.Anders@wsj.com, manaus@ibm.net, rquiel@msn.com, Riley.G@psicop.com, enforcement@sec.gov, rsqualey@usa.net (ROBERT QUALEy), muslhog@yahoo.com, DSPETRY@aol.com, twelti@optonline.net FROM; Jason Anders, WSJ ; Mr. Dobry, I've seen a few of your recent posts about AZNT on Raging Bull, and it seems you've been misinformed about several things regarding my story on the company's lawsuit. If you're interested in setting these matters straight, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Jason Anders ------------------------------------------- Jason, The matters are "set straight". You turned down Mr. Sylver's invitation to visit AZNT and discuss the defamation suit at length with him. You talked to NO STOCKHOLDERS who have had to endure a smear campaign against a co. they are invested in, their principals & ourselves, stockholders for 2 years. I saw no mention to the death threats we have rec'd, that AZNT has rec'd, the lawyers, employees & family members. I saw no mention of the shooting. I saw no mention of the AZNT short position, the DTC freeze of AZNT 's account to halt the stolen stock from being transfered and the short against it naked or the federal case against Mann & the firms that hypothecated the stolen stock. I saw NOTHING about the smear campaign. I saw NOTHING from you that suggested to the investment public that Shell & her goons target stocks/companies they define as "SCAMS' and don't leave until their "job" is completed. You gave the impression that Shell & co.'s acts are "legitimate: & AZNT's complaint was superflous. That was incredibly irresponsible of you. You seem to follow Shell around like a lovesick puppy, your article was a joke & I put no faith into anything you write. You had a chance to do real diligence & you opted not to, and instead wrote another fluff piece about Shell & her goon squad. Why didn't you mention her being sued by HITT for the same thing, her loss to BW for fraud, her avoiding service in the HITT case, that the Italian address & phone number she claims is her own actually belongs to Gloria Turrin? Do you do any diligence? Did you call the atty general in Sacramento? How about the SEC? The feds? No. ..you called Shell, Pauly & Mitchell. BTW, read SI rules & see how arbitrarily the rules are enforced and against who. Bob Zunbrunnen was a basher working side by side with your little pals before SI hired him to POLICE the threads! Great job Jason, NOT! Gary AZNT SHAREHOLDER "i email post to mike sylver. he forward it to qualey. las vegas sun tell gaming reporter he MUST go to aznt offices for interveiw BEFORE he can do article. reporter refuse!" To: antibash (who wrote...) From: Spider Valdez Tuesday, Oct 13 1998 11:42AM ET they are hypesters. today tonto post that las vegas sun reporter feels docs posted on si are authentic. i email post to mike sylver. he forward it to qualey. las vegas sun tell gaming reporter he MUST go to aznt offices for interveiw BEFORE he can do article. reporter refuse! lolol mitchell & tonto make friends with this reporter i think when they were bashing mtei, a casino. editor say no to bias article. today qualey is in court with judge. i will fill you in what i learn! spider ragingbull.lycos.com