SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: loantech who wrote (19665)12/27/2004 11:36:30 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
Bond insurer pulls out from new Oklahoma projects
Mon Dec 27, 2004 05:50 PM ET
OKLAHOMA CITY, Dec 27 (Reuters) - A major insurer of municipal bonds is declaring a moratorium on doing business with the state of Oklahoma due to a failed bond project for financing of a county jail, a state official said on Monday.
Office of State Finance Director Scott Meacham said MBIA Inc. (MBI.N: Quote, Profile, Research) is refusing to insure any more municipal bonds in Oklahoma after the Grady County jail, in Chickasha, Oklahoma, announced it could not make payments on $17.5 million in bonds issued to cover costs of a new, state-of-the-art detention facility.

Officials, inmates and workers at the jail began moving out this week after a stopgap financing measure did not make it out of the state house, Meacham said.

The move leaves only three major bond insurers left to do business with the state, Meacham said, adding the remaining insurers will likely raise rates on future issues in the state.

"Oklahoma has a black eye in the financial community," Meacham said.

Officials for MBIA were not immediately available for comment.
========================================================================
It appears that Oklahoma is not OK!
Who is next?
Mish



To: loantech who wrote (19665)12/27/2004 11:44:15 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. Municipalities Moving Toward a Finance Crackup: Joe Mysak
Dec. 15 (Bloomberg) -- New Jersey is headed toward a public finance crackup. It's just a matter of time. The state isn't alone.

Over the past three years, states and localities have sold record amounts of bonds, some to take advantage of lower borrowing costs and pay for new projects, some to refinance outstanding, higher cost debt, some, like New Jersey, to gain short-term budget relief.

In those places, at some point, the public finance magic wears off, and taxpayers are left wondering what happened.

In New York, for example, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority finds itself under fire for asking for new taxes and higher fares, just years after it concluded a massive, $14 billion refinancing.

In Pennsylvania, Northumberland County borrowed and spent its way toward a bankruptcy narrowly averted.

Those aren't the only municipalities where taxpayers are now wondering about what their political leadership did, and incidentally about the quality of advice they got from their underwriters and financial advisers.

A crackup is defined as a collapse or failure, a breakdown. In the municipal market, it's marked by that moment when ``stop the music'' is called.

More often than not, the public finance crackup is characterized by too much debt and too much politics, although in New Jersey, it appears that lack of political will is the culprit.

Auction Sale

The ingredients of a public finance crackup are volatile, the reaction delayed. The precise combination is always local and specific, which is why such crackups, like the municipal market itself, resist generalization.

A public finance crackup notably occurred in New Jersey in 1993, after the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Justice Department and the NASD all announced they were looking into why Wall Street was paying tiny, unknown Armacon Securities for -- what, exactly? Armacon was owned by two of then-Governor Jim Florio's close associates. If you wanted to get bond work in the state, it was apparently a good idea to send Armacon a couple of checks.

Governor Florio signed an executive order forcing all state issuers to sell their bonds through auction, also known as competitive, sale. Call it a big ``time out'' for the industry in the state.

Now the state is heading toward another crackup. This time around the apparent reason is not enough politics, rather than too much.

`Stop the Music'

What it will look like, nobody knows, because like all public finance crackups, there is a delay. New Jersey is one of the nation's wealthiest states, ranking second in per capita income after Connecticut. So a crackup will take some time.

But at some point, someone, perhaps a new governor, perhaps a rating company, is going to call ``stop the music'' to the state's lust for deficit financing.

The state announced last week that it was selling $763 million in bonds in order to effect a refinancing that would result in a present-value saving of $3 million, or less than one- half of one percent. Issuers traditionally look for present-value savings to be in the 4 percent to 5 percent range.

``The only way to measure a refinancing is through present value savings, and we are clearly ahead by that measure,'' said state Treasurer John McCormac, adding that the transaction was ``a win-win for New Jersey taxpayers.''

This is one of those remarks that really should be memorialized somewhere so it is never repeated.

`Win-Win'

Here's the ``win-win.'' With the refinancing, state lawmakers defer $430 million in debt service for two years. In exchange, taxpayers get to pay an additional $106 million over the life of the bonds.

In exchange for very short-term budget relief, the state is saddling taxpayers with years of indebtedness. Perhaps the most telling comment of all came from Assemblyman Louis Greenwald, who told the Bergen Record, ``Today we found $430 million to keep programs alive.''

New Jersey politicians don't want to cut spending. Instead, they want to borrow money until such time taxes come in to support whatever level of spending they deem necessary to get themselves reelected, whatever party they represent.

This may sound familiar. In July, the state's Supreme Court ruled that the state could go ahead with $2.5 billion in borrowing to balance the budget, but that it must not sell such bonds in the future. New Jersey lawmakers knew they were looking at a big hole in the budget for fiscal 2006. To fill it, they are doing -- more borrowing!

Don't blame Wall Street. Wall Street is very, very good at selling municipal bonds, because that's what Wall Street is paid to do. That's why the impulse to control a transaction and get it done is irresistible. Don't look to Wall Street for impartial advice on fiscal restraint. Wall Street will get bonds sold two days before someone yells ``stop the music.''