SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: twmoore who wrote (9480)12/28/2004 1:06:13 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 20039
 
tw,

Re: you would think that the insurance companies would jump on this

That is one aspect of the situation we find ourselves in that simply cannot comprehend. The evidence that the "official story" is an utter lie seems to be irrefutable. That being the case, why would the insurance companies be willing to play along with the ruse?

And why would formerly solid and reliably honest organizations like NIST seemingly want to subvert science and refute physics with their cockamamie superstition-based theorizations about the collapses of the WTC towers?

And for that matter, just how corrupt is Underwriter's Laboratories' management when they fire a decent employee who simply wants to remind NIST of what is written in high school physics textbooks, (i.e. jet fuel burns well below the temperature necessary to melt or even significantly weaken structural steel.)

The whole situation seems insane to me.