Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WWWWWWWWWW who wrote (23883)	12/29/2004 2:09:51 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

The more likely explanation is clumsy word choice on the part of Rumsfeld. Instead of saying "shot" down he meant to say brought down, or knocked down. Could be. That is so mangled it's impossible to make sense of it. Or mayube the USAF really did shoot it down. They certainly had good reason to. But hey, if the conspiracy theorists want to build a house of cards on top of that little foundation, they can go ahead. Oh, they've built entire cities in the sky on less than that. Every incident has loose ends. They try to weave whole-cloth lies from them. The gov't hardly always tells the truth. But it's a whole lot more reliable than Ray Duray.