SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (8536)12/29/2004 2:48:34 AM
From: axial  Respond to of 46821
 
Hi Ray -

"Wouldn't it be more sane to limit human population growth than to continue to irrevocably strip mine the planet's finite resources..."

Yes, it would. Who do we phone?

Population became self-limiting with the advent of the pill in Europe, the UK and North America. Paradoxically, those nations that could best afford population growth grew the least, probably the aggregate of individual decisions. People decided not to prejudice their own prosperity with too many children.

The outcome was that those nations soon found themselves with declining, aging populations, and a need for unskilled labour. To solve their problem, they looked to immigration which they got from nations with strongly-growing populations. That resulted in large expatriate populations within the more advanced nations. Their still-high growth rates and cultural predelictions challenge the balance of power - perhaps even the underlying national precepts - within the host countries. This, the legitimate result of large blocs voting democratically within these countries.

Talk about yer unintended consequences.

Meanwhile poor, undeveloped countries retain the highest population growth rates; their favourite immigration destinations are "have" countries (despite the rhetoric against them).

"Not having" seems to spur population growth; "having" seems to limit it. Self-interest is a powerful motivator, or so it seems.

Jim