SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President George W. Bush - Right or Wrong? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul van Wijk who wrote (313)12/30/2004 8:03:33 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 390
 
A UN official? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This the guy you're talking about?
freerepublic.com

All of us could be more generous if we were only tax dodgers.



To: Paul van Wijk who wrote (313)12/30/2004 8:10:37 PM
From: WWWWWWWWWW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 390
 
If somebody gives a dollar to a homeless person, does that mean Bill Gates should come along and give the homeless person $300,000?

The United States' response to the tsunami has been large, appropriate, and caring, and is still growing in fact and will probably result in a long-term commitment to establish a tsunami warning network for the entire region.

It's a shame that opportunists are using the tsunami as a soapbox on which to criticize the U.S. and Bush, but that's the way it goes.



To: Paul van Wijk who wrote (313)12/30/2004 9:06:27 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 390
 
How about these people?
Corporations Donate Millions for Quake Aid
Thursday December 30, 8:40 pm ET
By Michael P. Regan, AP Business Writer
U.S. Corporations Are Donating Millions in Cash and Supplies to Help Tsunami Victims

NEW YORK (AP) -- U.S. corporations are donating millions of dollars in cash and supplies to victims of the tsunamis along the Indian Ocean, easily eclipsing the initial $35 million in aid earmarked by the U.S. government.

In addition to cash, donations of everything from diapers, antibiotics, frequent-flier miles and a gel called OdorScreen meant to curb the stench of decaying bodies are on the way to the region in the wake of earthquake-fueled waves that have claimed more than 117,000 lives in Asia, India and Africa.

The final tally is yet to be known, but it's clear the Red Cross and other aid groups are experiencing perhaps the largest surge in donations since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks or the string of hurricanes that hit Florida and the Caribbean this summer.

"The volume (of donations) that they're seeing in the last few days is several times what they saw during the hurricanes, which was several times what they see on a normal day," said Charlie Cumbaa, a vice president at Blackbaud Inc., which makes software used by the Red Cross and many other aid agencies to process donations.

Among the biggest corporate givers are Pfizer Inc., which is donating $10 million in cash and $25 million worth of drugs to relief agencies; The Coca-Cola Co., which is donating $10 million; Exxon Mobil Corp., which is giving $5 million; and Citigroup Inc., which is contributing $3 million. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has pledged $3 million.

Pharmaceutical and health-care products companies were among the biggest givers.

Merck & Co. Inc. is giving $3 million in cash while Johnson & Johnson and Abbott Laboratories Inc. are each donating $2 million; each of the three are also sending drugs and other health care supplies to the region. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. is donating $1 million in cash and $4 million in antibiotics and antifungal drugs. Roche Group and GlaxoSmithKline PLC were also planning to donate supplies and/or cash.

Nike Inc., American Express Co., General Electric Co., The Walt Disney Co., and First Data Corp. are each giving $1 million.

For some corporations with operations in the countries struggling with the disaster, their far-flung enterprises are serving as quick supply routes for aid.

Drug makers with offices or plants in the region sent employees out with antibiotics, nutritional supplements, infant formula, baby food and other supplies. Employees of companies like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo Inc. and Marriott International Inc. hotels in the region are delivering bottled water, food and other supplies.

"They're sending whatever they can, as fast as they can," said Elaine Palmer, spokeswoman for PepsiCo, which rushed out Aquafina bottled water from one of its Indian bottlers and plans to contribute a minimum of $1 million to the relief effort.

Fresh drinking water is one of the items most needed. Many sources of fresh water, like wells, have been contaminated by seawater, debris and sewage.

In Thailand, Starbucks coffee shops are donating all of Wednesday's profits to the relief effort. The company also made an initial contribution of $100,000 and will donate $2 for every pound of certain coffees sold in January in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and Germany.

Many companies are offering to match employee donations to aid groups and are making it easier for customers to donate.

First Data's Western Union is offering free money transfers from U.S. and Canadian donors to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.

Amazon.com had collected about 87,000 donations totaling more than $5.4 million for the American Red Cross as of Thursday afternoon.

Wal-Mart Inc. is setting up collection containers at all of its stores, in addition to a $2 million donation from its foundation.

Google Inc. has put a link on its home page to relief groups, and America Online is encouraging members to donate to Network for Good, an online charity the Internet-service provider founded along with Cisco Systems Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo also added links to five charities on its home page.

AOL members donated more than $1 million in less than 48 hours, according to spokesman Nicholas Graham.

New York public-relations guru Howard Rubenstein said an opportunity for some good PR was probably not the only motivating factor in the corporate outpouring.

"I think it's a humanitarian instinct," he said. "And the byproduct would certainly be good PR for the corporation, and more importantly for our country."

Among the growing list of donations were some companies that have suffered bad press recently, including $200,000 from Computer Associates International Inc., which has been dealing with an accounting scandal. Pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Merck have recently had to deal with stories about increased risks of heart problems for patients taking their painkillers.

"For a company that's had negative PR, I think it will serve to soften the negative image," said Rubenstein. "I would urge all companies, but especially anybody who has made an apology to the public or who has sustained broadside media attacks, to consider this. It's another form of apology and goodwill. But also another form of doing right."

AP Business Writer Linda Johnson in Trenton, N.J., contributed to this report.
biz.yahoo.com



To: Paul van Wijk who wrote (313)12/31/2004 12:34:11 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 390
 
Look who's talking about 'stingy'

By Wesley Pruden

The Stinge-O-Meter, which the United Nations uses to measure the generosity of its members, is busted. The needle is spinning wildly, out of control.
    Jan Egeland, the chief bureaucrat in charge of the U.N. emergency relief, such as it is, gave the Stinge-O-Meter a mighty spin in the wake of the Asian tsunami and read the miserable verdict: The United States and the nations of the West are "stingy."
    Mr. Egeland, a Norwegian who throws up at the idea that anyone should spend his own money without bureaucratic guidance, says the trouble is rooted in the fact that Americans are not taxed enough. Americans would love to pay more taxes if only they could. Collecting more swag and turning more of it over to the United Nations would enable Kofi Annan to invite a few hundred more bureaucrats, maybe even thousands, to join the easy ride through Manhattan. Isn't that what we all want?
    When Colin Powell reminded him that Americans are the most generous people in the world and have the record to prove it, Mr. Egeland went back to the Stinge-O-Meter for a second reading. Mr. Egeland, who knows who pays for his sweet life, decided that his churlish remarks had been "misinterpreted," though "stingy" is a word not easily misinterpreted.
    The New York Times and The Washington Post, always on the scout for mean things to say about Americans other than their own grand selves, agreed with Mr. Egeland's first reading of the Stinge-O-Meter. "Are we stingy?" asked the New York Times. "Yes."
    America the stingy fits with The Post's view of a world where all news is bad, the sun shines only on the rich, the rain falls only on the frail, and everyone is a victim — of homophobia in Peoria, AIDS in Afghanistan, an outbreak of teenage pimples in San Diego, a tsunami in Sri Lanka, the scarcity of vegetarian restaurants in Topeka, a woman who got winked at in Cleveland, a shortage of condoms in St. Paul. Some days there are so many victims there's hardly any room for the news on Page One.
    The early verdict on the Asian tsunami, naturally, is that it's all George W.'s fault. Noting that the president had doubled the American aid commitment, The Post reported that the doubling came "amid complaints that the vacationing President Bush has been insensitive to a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions."
    The president was working at the ranch, lollygagging about with Laura and the girls, when Bill Clinton, working his Pain-O-Meter on fading battery power, was busy in London feeling tsunami pain at a 10,000-mile remove. So eager were The Post's reporters to get the poop to the public they couldn't stop to find any actual complaints, and the only stray talking head they turned up was a pensioned ex-president of the Council on Foreign Relations, eager to see his name in the paper again but who could supply only weak goo-goo: "You've got to show that you care."
    Showing he cared to the satisfaction of nearly everyone else, the president announced that the United States had organized an international aid consortium to act quickly and decisively to assuage as much pain as it could. This was too much for the bureaucrats and their special pleaders. Clare Short, the ex-secretary of international development for the U.N., said the president's initiative "sounds like yet another attempt to undermine the U.N." (What the starving Asians need is not groceries and medicines, but resolutions of the Security Council, which only the U.N. can supply.)
    "Stingy" is a word that everybody understands. We don't really need a Stinge-O-Meter to know who's stingy and who's not. The blue states and the media elites who speak for them know about stingy. What they know very little about is the generosity of those for whom they reserve their contempt.
    The latest index compiled by the Catalogue for Philanthropy, a nonpartisan Boston-based organization, shows that the states with the most generous givers to charity are among the poorest: Mississippi ranks No. 1, followed by Arkansas, Oklahoma and Louisiana.
    The richest states are the stingiest, the natural audience of the media elites. Connecticut, the richest of the states, based on an analysis of IRS data, ranks 44th in charitable giving. New Jersey and Massachusetts, the second- and third-richest states, rank 47th and 49th in charitable giving. George McCully, the president of the Boston-based Catalogue for Philanthropy, says it's about the culture, not the geography. You don't need a Stinge-O-Meter to figure that out.
    
    Wesley Pruden is editor in chief of The Times.