SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (70158)12/30/2004 9:45:40 PM
From: WWWWWWWWWW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Huh? I've never exchanged any PM with you.

When I said repetitive/disruptive people should be punted, I wasn't talking about you, if that's how you took it. You are obviously a witty person and I enjoy your posts, in fact.

"Who is the judge of that? You? SOROS? And what are the standards?"

SOROS. It's his thread. His right to ban anyone he wants trumps the right of anyone who wishes to post against his wishes, if I read the FAQ & TOU correctly. I was just putting in my two cents like others have.

He can be as biased or unbiased as he wants. Based on his recent statements it sounds like wants to be the latter, though.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (70158)12/30/2004 11:59:46 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
"SOROS is well known to have made quite a few messes of his own."

As far as I know, I'm really only on the WAY FAR OUTS with da cheif, and that's because I asked too many questions about his calls from April, 2000 until Oct. 2002. He basically told me that he did not want anyone on his thread who was not a perma-bull. So be it.

PM me with the other "messes" I have made. I'd like to clear them up. ;)

I remain,

SOROS