SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: data_rox who wrote (43962)1/3/2005 11:45:25 AM
From: Jim Mullens  Respond to of 197414
 
Skip, FYI – QCOM IPR report courtesy of Jim Lur (IH QCOM)

vertikalgroup.net

(woops, DR you beat me to it!)

From a quick read the report appears to view the Q’s license agreements as very solid, so much so that the QCOM “risk” could come from the industry players adopting non-CDMA technologies (see snip below).
The report mentioned OFDM, but surprisingly I did not see the mention of WiMAX. Wonder why?

Snips>>>>>

_ Risks. The growing size of the economic surplus being captured by Qualcomm’s licensing
model provides financial incentives for certain wireless industry players to adopt non-
CDMA technologies that could carry much more favorable financial licensing terms than
those currently charged by Qualcomm. We view this as a much more significant risk than
either the expiration of Qualcomm’s early patents or engineering attempts by other
companies to place future evolutionary CDMA technologies outside the scope of
Qualcomm’s intellectual property coverage.



To: data_rox who wrote (43962)1/3/2005 11:53:12 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 197414
 
Terrific find.

As usual, the only possible fly in the ointment is Flash-OFDM. However, so long as Q keeps its rates reasonable, it seems that there shouldn't be enough financial incentive for anyone to compete with any of the CDMA variants.

Thanks for bringing that excellent report here, Data.