Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (214236)	1/4/2005 12:06:42 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574029

Could be... maybe they are real, but I can't figure how somebody could take some of those pictures, and survive. In the meantime, Bush continues to refuse to include Iraq in the budget. I wonder what the real deficit is? 100 Billion, and the only result is that they hate us and we kill them. Go figure. Congress expects $100 billion war request By Peronet Despeignes, USA TODAY Congress expects the White House to request as much as $100 billion this year for war and related costs in Iraq (news - web sites) and Afghanistan (news - web sites), congressional officials say. It would be the third and largest Iraq-related budget request from the White House yet, and it could push the war's costs over $200 billion - far above initial White House estimates of $50 billion-$60 billion. So far, the Iraq war has cost about $130 billion, according to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. War costs complicate President Bush (news - web sites)'s plans for initiatives such as overhauling Social Security (news - web sites). They also threaten his pledge to halve the record $413 billion federal budget deficit. Jim Dyer, chief of staff of the House Appropriations Committee, traditionally the first stop in Congress for any official request for money, said he expects a funding proposal from the Bush administration by Easter that "could be around $100 billion," the vast majority of it for Iraq. In the Senate, Bill Hoagland, the top budget aide to Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, agreed: "Based on current spending profiles, it would not surprise me if ... (a bill) approaching $100 billion is requested early this year." That would be equal to almost one-quarter of the Pentagon (news - web sites)'s $417.5 billion 2005 budget. Both expect the proposal to come as a "supplemental" spending request, a move that would keep it out of the budget Bush will submit in February. The White House budget office declined to comment on the number. "It's too early to say what our needs will be," spokesman Chad Kolton said. He said the Iraq request is being kept out of the budget to provide time to get a more accurate cost estimate and to make it easier to reduce funding when U.S. troops are eventually withdrawn. Members of Congress expect a big price tag for Iraq this year. "I hope they ask for something big," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (news - web sites). "Look, this is a test of wills. We need to show our enemies that we are not going to do this on the cheap. " But there is growing annoyance with the White House for refusing to treat the cost of the military operations in Iraq - roughly $5 billion a month, according to the House Appropriations Committee - as part of the annual budget. "There is a feeling among a lot of members that ... this war has become enough of a routine that they should be able to build it into their annual budgeting and not have to come back to us for supplemental funding of that size," said Rep. Jim Kolbe (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., head of the House Appropriations panel that oversees spending on foreign operations. "The annual budget proposal we've been given by the White House falsely portrays the bottom line," said Rep. John Spratt (news, bio, voting record), D-S.C., senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee.