SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (24835)1/4/2005 9:04:15 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Read again, this time a shorter excerpt so maybe you can absorb information in small batches:

"The House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 126, a vote in which 79% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voted yes. The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats and only 6 Republicans voting no. "

Facts. Just the facts.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (24835)1/4/2005 10:28:32 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Respond to of 90947
 
Democrats - The Party that Gave Southern Racism a Capital "R" and Segregation a Capital "S"

In the 1880s and early 1890s, the Populist party was winning the support of poor White and Black farmers and small businessmen. Southern Populist were so successful challenging the Southern Democratic Party that it seemed that soon the Populists would dominate local and state governments in the South. But the Southern Democratic Party and the economic and political elites whose interests they represented were determined to prevent this. They decided that the only way to break the back of the Populist party was to stir up racism and racial division between Blacks and Whites. Southern Democratic party demagogues in the 1890s and early 1900s charged that Blacks were becoming an increasing threat to Southern society, they were once again trying to dominate the South as they had during "Reconstruction." To prevent the growing threat of "Black Rule," Southern Democratic leaders argued that Blacks must once again be put back in their place.

In addition to stirring up White racial fears about Black domination, Southern Democratic leaders convinced Southern workers and poor Southern farmers that their problems were caused by Black competition for jobs and for economic opportunities. They argued that if Blacks were forced to stay in their place that White Southern workers and farmers would be guaranteed high-paying, good jobs and could once again manage successful farms. In addition, Southern Democratic leaders convinced large plantation farmers and agricultural interests that their growing economic crisis caused by Blacks increasing refusal to work as underpaid farm laborers could be solved if Blacks were forced to stay in their place. In the end, Southern Democratic leaders convinced Southern whites that their success depended on keeping Blacks in their place as second-class citizens with little rights.


colorado.edu

Then there's this:

The Democratic Party’s Legacy of Racism
Editorial
December 2002

by: Mackubin T. Owens

The Democratic Party’s war against African-Americans continued after the Civil War (which many Democrats in fact opposed, often working actively to undercut the Union war effort). Democrats, both north and south fought the attempt to implement the equality for African-Americans gained at such a high cost. This opposition was often violent. Indeed, the Ku Klux Klan operated as the de facto terrorist arm of the national Democratic Party during Reconstruction.

Democrats defeated Reconstruction in the end and on its ruins created Jim Crow. Democratic liberalism did not extend to issue of race. Woodrow Wilson was the quintessential "liberal racist," a species of Democrat that later included the likes of William Fulbright of Arkansas, Sam Ervin of North Carolina, and Albert Gore, father of Al, of Tennessee.

* * *

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.


ashbrook.org

Ah yes, the Democrats, the party of moderation and inclusion.