SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Orcastraiter who wrote (24843)1/4/2005 9:03:23 PM
From: WWWWWWWWWW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Nothing wrong with the concept of better counting, who could argue with that, but your comments on this board sometimes seem to stray over into "the Republicans stole the election; there was fraud and I know it; they hacked the machines" etc. and that's where you align yourself with wacko bloggers who have no evidence. You seem smarter than that, IMO

I believe the election was sound. If Jesse Jackson wants to work on getting more booths into certain parts of town for the next election, that's great, but the final results matched the pre-Election day polls -- it was only the early exit polls that were aberrant -- and there's a lot more evidence that the exit polls were flawed rather than the election itself or the counting.

I'm sure we can beat this horse a little deader though :-)



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (24843)1/4/2005 9:13:37 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
lol. Why bother with machine counts at all, except to tell the dems how many they'll need to concoct in the ensuing hand count.