Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (92609)	1/5/2005 4:52:39 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 108807

"He was talking about individuals, not the leadership. " So was I. The women were individuals equally entitled to protections of civil government. Clinton used his authority over the civil government to cause them harm... don't know how it is you are missing that point. Do you really equate the sex-antics of Clinton, who was set up, to the KNOWING starting of a war under false pretense?" You apparently prefer to ignore the facts of the situation. As I stated previously, how clinton gets off is a non-issue to most of us. I am sure you get that so how does it serve you to keep promoting that straw man? Regarding your accusations toward Bush: I have seen no substantive proof that these are true. They are based on speculation and innuendo. If you have irrefutable proof, I am interested in seeing it. I have seen many debates on the topic so don't bother handing me street corner tracts.