SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (19084)1/6/2005 12:16:53 AM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
There are those who think that life
Has nothing left to chance
With a host of holy horrors
To direct our aimless dance

A planet of playthings
We dance on the strings
Of powers we cannot perceive
The stars aren’t aligned ---
Or the gods are malign
Blame is better to give than receive

You can choose a ready guide
In some celestial voice
If you choose not to decide
You still have made a choice

You can choose from phantom fears
And kindness that can kill
I will choose a path that’s clear
I will choose free will

There are those who think that they’ve been dealt a losing hand
The cards were stacked against them ---
They weren’t born in lotus-land

All preordained
A prisoner in chains
A victim of venomous fate
Kicked in the face
You can’t pray for a place
In heaven’s unearthly estate

Each of us
A cell of awareness
Imperfect and incomplete
Genetic blends
With uncertain ends
On a fortune hunt
That’s far too fleet...



To: one_less who wrote (19084)1/6/2005 9:48:32 AM
From: Solon  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 28931
 
In order to have ANY "present" moments we need to have events that are separated by space and movement, ergo: time. Change can only occur with time. Without movement there can be no events and thus no "time". With movement there MUST be time. Eternity is defined as time without end because it is clearly nonsensical to think of events without time. The idea of eternity requires past, present, and future; because if there is no before and after there can be no experience--because nothing can be recognized as having occurred, for the simple reason that under such conditions nothing has occurred.

The fact that we experience "present" moments has nothing to do with the argument. The fact is that the "moments" are separated in experience. Some moments are before others and some moments come after others. We know now that time is relational and bound to events in space. It is our experience of movement, change, and events which constitutes the apprehension of time. If we do not experience time, then we do not experience events. If such a universe existed in some other dimension, it could not include the experience of anything whatsoever. To make an analogy: If walking to the corner does not require any time, then I cannot walk to the corner--because in order to walk to the corner I must move through a series of events. One cannot be two places at the same time.

Thus, without time--no events can occur. Without movement relative to objects there is no time. So when the last electron comes to a stop in the universe (if it ever does)--time (which is either change--or our experience of change) STOPS.