SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scion who wrote (1705)1/6/2005 3:33:56 AM
From: Louie_al-Arouri  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5425
 
scionist , know of any chemical companies near the Chicago-based one the feds shut-down? ;0)

Additionally, al-Ali and IIRO funneled millions of dollars to a Chicago-based chemical company run by a director of Mercy International. The company was raided by the FBI in 1997 amidst allegations of terrorism support and suspicious chemical compounds. The Mercy director is currently serving a 51-month sentence for fraud. IIRO's offices in Virginia were also raided as part of the investigation.

nationalreview.com


Maybe this is another made-to-order stockupticks.com promotion??? Ya think? A "partnership" with that "other" Mercy maybe? ;0)



To: scion who wrote (1705)1/6/2005 3:47:21 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
It's fascinating in many respects to argue with a pathological liar. For example, you could have a paragraph that says "John said he didn't do it. However, everyone present said he did" and the pathological liar will just quote the first sentence as proof John didn't do it. Or: "I started ACME Corp in 1995 but it burned down in 1995." The pathological liar will say "The reason why you burned it down was to cover up for someone that happened three years later." Or: "I don't believe you were able to drive your car across the ocean" to which the reply might be "You keep claiming I can't drive my car."

On the one hand, the deductions are so absurd and so blatant you feel compelled to point them out. But, on the other hand, you just can't fathom anyone else could be that stupid so as to have to be shown the absurdity.

- Jeff



To: scion who wrote (1705)1/6/2005 6:42:05 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
He's 47 now, isn't he? Old enough to know better.