Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (25174)	1/6/2005 4:46:43 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Wow...it's the smoking gun... Jeff Graessle, Franklin County Election Operations Division Manager, told the Citizen’s Alliance for Secure Elections (CASE) Ohio voting rights activists that Franklin County does not use a simple 100 votes per machine guideline. Rather, they allocated their machines in the 2004 election based on a new criteria determined by active registered voters. Hence, an affluent area like Upper Arlington which has shown a consistent pattern of active voters is rewarded with more machines and fewer losses. A less affluent area of Columbus where voters miss voting at more elections and may only come out in a hotly contested election, like Bush-Kerry, are punished with fewer machines. In their own words...a skunk can't hide from their own stink! So they needed a new criteria for voting machine distribution? And of course they had to implement it just for the big hotly contested election! Who ordered the change in policy??????? FRAUD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Uncovered!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Orca