Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (155482)	1/7/2005 11:24:15 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Any of this would be relevant if the issue was the enforcement of Iraq's obligations to the UN -- but not one bit of this even begins to rise to the level of the self-defense of the United States of America -- nada. The perpetual mixing of US self-defense and the enforcement of Iraq's obligations to the UN reveal either a level of confusion on your part that is hard to excuse, or else an outright attempt to confuse the issues so badly that no judgement can be made. Either way, the confusion must not be perpetuated. The US had no grounds to invade Iraq in "self-defense" from Iraqi WMDs.