Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (92834)	1/7/2005 3:46:03 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

"In regard to Mr. Buschman being banned, if you will reread what you wrote, you seem to be confusing the ban and ignore functions. My ignore function is off at the moment, and if anyone wants to communicate with me about being unbanned, they are free to do so. Why not just unban everyone unconditionally, as you indicated this was your goal. If anyone is offended by the notion that you have given them posting priveleges here, they can PM you with their objection. Then you can, reban them or put them on ignore at your leasure.

To: Grainne who wrote (92834)	1/7/2005 4:26:01 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I apologize for misreading your intent. But yes, there ia a group who wishes to stick this on the US. Message 20923926 He's just one. The US is the modern bogeyman: guilty of everything. "Okay all you scientists--is it even remotely possible that an underground nuclear test can cause an earthquake? I think this sounds far fetched, but am curious, particularly since the earthquake was so powerful and the tsunami so untypical of this geographical area. Opinions?" Theory says maybe. No one knows and no one knows how to control such consequences. War Departments of variuos nations (incuding the US) have been looking at this for a long time; none know how to acheive a desired result. And I note that you are seemingly trying to change the meaning of my statement. Deliberately misconstruing anyone's statements seems to verge on being a personal attack, so I would suggest that it is not a good idea. If you intend to treat everything- -including questioning you and your motives- -as a persoanl attack, you may ban me NOW! You are hardly in a position to cast the first stone. That is not even subject to debate. I also consider posting aricles known to be inaccurate as a deliberate attempt to deceive. You can take THAT into account to. Mr. Buschman has been informed. The rest is up to him.