Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (155531)	1/8/2005 3:10:22 AM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Whatever.I've Had it With Your Stupid Funking Ignorance Mike. Shalom!

To: michael97123 who wrote (155531)	1/8/2005 8:57:32 AM
From: GST	Respond to of 281500

<from all the worlds nations intel depts> No foreign intelligence service in the world made the case that Saddam was a threat to the United States, providing a foundation for a US invasion. Not one. That is why they would not back the US acting unilaterally. There was no threat. But there were serious problems with Saddam's accounting for WMD as he was required to do under the UN agreement that stopped the first gulf war -- that was where the foreign intelligence services could have been extremely helpful in providing the foundation for legitimate UN action. We instead chose illegitimate US action -- and going down that road has made all the different difference -- a tragic difference for us and for the Iraqis.