SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RealMuLan who wrote (58470)1/7/2005 6:06:23 PM
From: RealMuLan  Respond to of 74559
 
Ottawa seeks Chinese investors


By PATRICK BRETHOUR and STEVEN CHASE

Eager to promote Chinese investment, the federal government is preparing to forge a wide-ranging pact with Beijing that will lay the foundation for investments in the energy sector and other key areas of the Canadian economy.

Ottawa quietly began negotiating a foreign investor promotion and protection agreement with China during talks in Beijing this fall. Such an agreement would take trade relations to a new level because it would safeguard the rights of investors in each of the countries, giving them the legal standing as domestic businesses.

It is part of a push by Prime Minister Paul Martin — who visits China later this month — to increase Canada's share of direct foreign investment. “China has been identified as one of the key markets for Canada in terms of trade and investment over all,” said Andrea Lanthier, press secretary to International Trade Minister Jim Peterson

And the agreement comes as talks between Chinese and Canadian energy firms gain momentum, with Husky Energy Inc. being eyed by one state oil company, and pipeline operator Enbridge Inc. aiming to ink a deal shortly that could give a Chinese company a 49-per-cent ownership stake in a pipeline designed to carry crude from Alberta's oil sands to British Columbia — and across the Pacific. At the same time, China is pursuing investment opportunities across the globe, with Unocal Corp. in the United States the target of a takeover bid from Chinese state oil firm China National Offshore Oil Corp., according to the Financial Times.

The Martin government's focus on China is part of its campaign to expand trade beyond the United States amid concerns that a string of recent free-trade deals signed by Washington is diluting Canada's special access to the U.S. market. China is Canada's second-largest trading partner with two-way merchandise trade of $23.3-billion in 2003, up 16 per cent from 2002. Mr. Martin leaves for Asia next week on a marathon trade mission to China, Japan and India. He is leaving earlier than scheduled, on Jan. 15, in order to visit tsunami-ravaged Thailand and Sri Lanka first.

According to The Wall Street Journal, China and Canada are close to signing an accord on investment in Canadian oil resources, which could be signed some time this month. However, an official with the Prime Minister's Office said he is not aware of any broad bilateral agreement on energy.

But the federal government is concerned about arresting a troubling, long-term decline in the share of foreign direct investment that Canada receives.

It aims to make it more attractive for emerging and mature economies to invest capital here.

“Canadian assets must be promoted to international investors ... in partnership with provinces, territories and municipalities,” says a declassified July, 2004, briefing book for the Trade Minister's office that The Globe and Mail obtained under access to information law.

Senior trade officials have warned the Liberal government that Canada is facing an alarming decline in the share of direct foreign investment it receives — a threat to future job creation and innovation.

“Our share of world foreign direct investment has dwindled significantly over the past 20 years,” the briefing book said, to 3.1 per cent in 2002, from 7.7 per cent in 1980. Canada's share of North American foreign direct investment has also fallen to 12 per cent in 2002, from 21 per cent in 1990.

theglobeandmail.com



To: RealMuLan who wrote (58470)1/7/2005 6:19:47 PM
From: arun gera  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
>so you actually compare all the aids, including those from Red Cross, with the above aids?>

Isn't the cross in Red Cross a religious symbol? I am not belittling all the good things thay are doing.

In India the trident is a religious symbol. I can imagine a charitable institution called Red Trident in India. Of course that would have different connotations in the west.

And let us not be that innocent. The Christian church was a body more political than most governments for almost two milleniums. Imperialists and christian missionaries worked together to win over the uncivilized masses. Converts paid their churches tithes (voluntary taxes)for ever expanding Amway like organizations.

Dalits in India are prime targets for evangelical christians. Helping out during calamities by giving aids (bribes) is a favorite tool of conversion. Wonder if the "activist" was being encouraged by an evangelical church.

-Arun