Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (155561)	1/8/2005 1:39:49 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"It's curious that the de facto alliance of the Left and the Islamo-fascists (GST is a prime example of whatever opinions are foremost in this alliance) forces the Left to defend Saddam as an innocent lamb." I have yet to see anyone say Saddam is an innocent lamb. Please give a link, or retract this silly statement.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (155561)	1/12/2005 10:06:36 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 281500

Yes, I just wanted to avoid wrangling over Al Qaida.<g> It is hard to believe the willingness to ignore the malevolence and pattern of bad action that made Saddam a threat.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (155561)	1/12/2005 10:13:39 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<It's curious that the de facto alliance of the Left and the Islamo-fascists (GST is a prime example of whatever opinions are foremost in this alliance) forces the Left to defend Saddam as an innocent lamb.> Typical of your smear tactics -- now you accuse me of defending Saddam as a "lamb" and align me with "Islamo-fascists". In other posts you align me with "Hitlers" for daring to say that our support for Israel should depend on Israeli willingness to seek peace. It appears you have no shame. If I want to know the hard-core Israeli right wing position on an issue, all I need to do is read your posts.