Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (94225)	1/8/2005 6:14:37 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793750

The Second Amendment states that "a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Only a liberal leftist lawyer could misinterpret what that means. Our forefathers were NOT into writing FANCY CLAUSES that could be gotten around. They said it PLAIN AND CLEAR. Since the MILITIA was drawn up from the PEOPLE they wanted THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms. I cannot believe the majority of the people could interpret that any other way, and for a judge to do so just shows you what the heck is going on in our judiciary today, ie activist judges attempting TO REWRITE our constitution WITHOUT the will of the people. jdn