Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (1799)	1/8/2005 3:00:54 PM
From: Louie_al-Arouri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

Truthseeker, the Iran-Contra "co-conspirator" in that cut & paste is Elliott Abrams. Khaled was never involved in the Iran/Contra scandal from what I know. Elliott Abrams was pardonned by Bush for his Iran/Contra war crimes and was assigned as chairman of a DC Human Rights think-tank on which Khaled Elgindy served. Elliot Abram's current title is Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Near East and North African Affairs. You need to read for comprehension. Glad to help out. Wow Pugs, you actually accuse Elgindys brother of being a Iran-Contra co-conspirator and Elliot Abram a Bush-pardonned Iran-Contra war criminal.

To: StockDung who wrote (1799)	1/8/2005 3:35:15 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 5425

Here is a typical conversation with Dobry (Y=you; D=Dobry): D: Firetrucks are red, so everything red must be a firetruck. Y: Apples are red, and they aren't firetrucks. D: You are lying. You know apples are also green. Y: I'm saying that just because something is red doesn't mean it's a firetruck. D: But you lied and said apples can't be red. Y: Yes, duh, apples can be green, but that wasn't my point. And, besides, the thing you are talking about wasn't even red. D: So now you are contradicting yourself. Y: No, I was just pointing out your logic flaw, but your facts are also wrong so your argument is invalidated. D: Are you denying that firetrucks can be red? ROFL. Y: What? Show me where I said firetrucks can't be red. I said not all firetrucks are red. I also not all apples are red. D: You ignored what I said about firetrucks and talked about apples. You are twisting things as usual. etc. The point is, you can't have a rational discussion with an irrational person, not to mention pathological liar. Which explains why people like Scionist stopped trying long ago and just post past examples on the theory that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. - Jeff