SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (667772)1/9/2005 2:00:46 PM
From: SGJ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Do you mean Iraqi's=Terrorists?
So that we must kill all Iraqi's?
That's genocide talk.
Or do you mean Terrorists, those that have committed or are planning terror acts against innocent civilians?
Are Iraqi insurgents fighting an occupying force to be considered terrorists? Are they targeting innocent civilians? Or maybe those they consider civil enemies among thier countrymen? What happens in a civil war situation if the free elections contribute to an Iraqi tyranny of the majority? Are the Sunni minority then all terrorists if they begin to fight for representation? All Sunni's must then be exterminated in your view?

Advocating draconian measures allow the venting of frustrations, but don't make much sense in dealing with real world problems. The more drastic the action implemented, the more greater the force of the blowback. This is universal law observed daily.



To: JDN who wrote (667772)1/10/2005 8:30:11 AM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769670
 
We don't want the new Iraqi government to go that far, but they definitely need the death penalty to punish terrorists, which is what they are. It's disgusting that the media wishes to dignify terrorists with the label of insurgents. They are a cowardly lot that cover their faces like Muslim women.

* * *