Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1842)	1/9/2005 4:48:17 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 5425

GOELO & EL-BATRAWI ARE BOTH CUSTOMERS AT RICHMARK CAPITAL CORP some info on Richmark Capital google.com ================================================== Notices of Proposed Sale Reported on Form 144 of GOELO FRANCOIS Description Click on the column header links to resort ascending () or descending (). Company Select a company below for more information. Relation File Date Shares Broker INTL BROADCASTING CORP UK 4/9/2002 3,000,000 RICHMARK CAPITAL CORP Notices of Proposed Sale Reported on Form 144 of EL-BATRAWI RAMY Description Click on the column header links to resort ascending () or descending (). Company Select a company below for more information. Relation File Date Shares Broker GENESISINTERMEDIA INC SH 5/14/2002 240,000 RICHMARK CAPITAL CORP GENESISINTERMEDIA INC SH 2/19/2002 240,000 RICHMARK CAPITAL CORP

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1842)	1/9/2005 5:53:42 PM
From: Tommy Hicks	Respond to of 5425

Dr. Dobry, god bless your research, your investment acumen, your medical career, and your quest to win a boxing match. Your efforts do not go unnoticed. th

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1842)	1/10/2005 4:52:35 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

He certainly alludes to it with a great deal of innuendo. But let's skip that point for a minute. How do you interpret the Hopster's writing in terms of of who's responsible for 9/11? What impression do you get from it, that is apparently different from Jeff's? I did see one of Dan's articles up there that, in a fairly 'point-blank' manner, said it was Saudi elites, running drugs who didn't want their cover blown, and the Bush administration assisted in keeping it covered (because, via more innuendo, the CIA is in a cooperative drug-running biz, as well). I anticipate that you'll disagree, so how is Dan's writing getting misinterpreted from your POV? When you read Dan, who do you think he says is responsible for 9/11? "NOWHERE at NO TIME did Dan EVER claim the Saudi's were responsible for 9/11."