To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (1858 ) 1/10/2005 11:10:45 AM From: Louie_al-Arouri Read Replies (2) | Respond to Before you work yourself into a tizzy, you might re-read my post. Or heck, even read it a first time! I was asking your opinion of who the Hopster paints as responsible. Welcome to Terrorland ,I've veiwed his documetary. I know the researchers who work with Dan. I know the amount of time they spent in Venice, Fla and which players they interveiwed, for days, not hours. I have NEVER seen ANYWHERE ANYTHING from Dan's faction about Saudi's masterminding 9/11. I have seen only you & Mitchell make these claims. My opinion of Hopsicker's work has to do with Hopsicker's actual work. My opinion of what you and Mitchell wrote in regards to Hopsicker's work is that you've obviously never read Dan's work therefore, your opinion of it has absolutely no merit. You guys simply use other people, researchers, anything, as devices to accomplish your goals, whether they be changing the topic of a board or by disparaging Dan to disparage others by association. The same webfraud SOP we've seen for years. It doesn't matter to you that you don't know Dan's work or you start out by making claims Dan is responsible for the crap MItchell claims. Mitchell is a loose cannon. Like his posts regarding Mercy, etc. He shoots from the hip, embarrasses himself and then overcompensates by lashing out at Pug's for his stupid postings.Message 20884795 Welcome to Terrorland , never veiwed Flying Circus and starts off a dialogue with major "flaws"/mistatements that could've been easily prevented by actually reading Dan's work before commenting on it. Seems an "asshole" starts off an exchange just like you did.
