Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1866)	1/10/2005 11:39:20 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

The only "con-artist" is you Dobry, in more ways than one..."I'm sitting in front of a pile of papers from British Intelligence, its over." ...said Dobry. By: Maytag_Repairs $$$$ 28 Mar 2001, 10:26 AM EST Msg. 103057 of 181225 (This msg. is a reply to 103055 by janice456.) Shell, it's over. I'm sitting in front of a pile of papers from British Intelligence, its over. As far as Sylver, we were lied "to", not "for". I've been telling you for close to 2 yrs we've been talking to the feds & the SEC. I've also worked with other researchers for articles & book I've written/writing on the experience. It's over, and you know it. ragingbull.lycos.com By: Maytag_Repairs $$$$ 28 Mar 2001, 10:48 AM EST Msg. 103059 of 181225 (This msg. is a reply to 103058 by janice456.) Shell, you're in denial. Actually, British Intelligence forwarded it the PI who specializes in corporate espionage. It's over Shell. EOD ragingbull.lycos.com

To: Louie_al-Arouri who wrote (1866)	1/10/2005 12:16:16 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

Dobry explains the meaning of "con"...The prefix 'con' = 'against' by DEFINITION it is the antithesis of what you state. In latin, which is what it is derived, it is subjugated to -fidant/-dence ..inflicting your connotation as an anomoly at best. Con-vict, subjagating it to -vict, or AGAINST / VICTIM is the proper deriviation. To:sandshark who wrote (8526) From: Pugs Friday, Oct 24, 1997 5:58 PM Respond to 8528 of 55353 Actually its' derived from 'CONVICT', in franglais, french slang, they assimilate english into french.....i.e; 'Intellectual'='intello', .....'convict'='con'........I hope when this is over, alot of the 'con's' aren't bunking w/ the prison 'intello', BUBBA!, Pugs Message 2543656 ===== To:Markas who wrote (8522) From: Pugs Friday, Oct 24, 1997 6:21 PM Respond to 8537 of 55353 Markas, your definition is wrought with fault. The prefix 'con' = 'against' by DEFINITION it is the antithesis of what you state. In latin, which is what it is derived, it is subjugated to -fidant/-dence ..inflicting your connotation as an anomoly at best. Con-vict, subjagating it to -vict, or AGAINST / VICTIM is the proper deriviation. I would suggest you are Short on RMIL, are here to discredit Riley, and in truth , only discredit yourself w/ your silly definitions. The french have assimilated 'con' -ard, tu piges?, Pugs Message 2543833