Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (667951)	1/10/2005 3:36:59 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Unless there is some requirement for a courtroom with jurors and judges, seems to me any NCO or Officer in the field who picked up these individuals instantly adjudicated these individuals and determined that they are not POWs. I don't see any requirements for a formal process. But lets say there was no adjudication for arguments sake. Then if the detainees are afforded the protections of the treaty prior to an adjudication, then NONE of the detainees is allowed to challenge their detentions in courts, because POWs are not allowed to challenge their detentions. That however is not whats happening.