Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (94568)	1/10/2005 3:54:45 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 793820

In my experience, and I've written a lot of these reports, you limit your assertions to what is clearly so. It's counter-productive to embellish with what can be contested, particularly if those embellishments don't add to the penalty. I can certainly understand that, particularly in this litigious age. However, by taking this line, the penalty seems a bit harsher than it ought to be. On the other hand, the kind of breach we are discussing certainly is one for which discharge is appropriate. It's not a big point to me, simply a bit of a puzzling anomaly. Thanks for throwing a bit of light on it.