Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (13877)	1/10/2005 9:12:40 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17683

CNBC, being the only financial network left, is PRO BUSH. My god one listen to Kudlow and Cramer can tell you that. Here's your Bush markets, and BTW we are NOT at an alltime high in either naz or dow finance.yahoo.com The markets have been on a bull tear since early 80s. We went one way - UP. Since Bush, flatline. No interest, nothing. Innovation isn't the problem, we are sitting on some of the most profitable growth companies since I can't remember. These are GOOG and YHOO. Plus, there is probably a platform shift coming in technology when microsoft falls. There is NO REASON for the markets to be in this dead zone. There is only so long we can blame 911, that excuse is old but Bush supporters keep using it. Wake me up when we create 350K jobs for a 3 mos, consecutive period like we did MONTH AFTER MONTH in the 90s. Why can't we do now, what we did then? One reason: BUSH- mr. extreme spender, mr. downer, mr. inability to negotiate EVEN WITH OUR ALLIES. When Bush is out, in 08, we will have a real bull market. Not before. We'll just flop around until he is gone. BTW this is not partisan. IF Arnold Schwartzenegger were president, the markets would be on a tear. Not with Bush, the man is a loser.