Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (93139)	1/10/2005 10:23:30 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

:-) Must be a little hot under that 10 gallon, eh pardner?

To: one_less who wrote (93139)	1/11/2005 3:13:07 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

It seems obvious to me that there is a lot of animosity between you, Laz and Ionesco. That is what caused all the friction in the first place when I came back to Feelies--that I encouraged her to post here if she felt like it, and you did not want her here. And a lot of ancient history was dragged up around it, and a lot of bad feelings oozed all over the thread. I have now read all of your posts, Laz's posts, and Ionesco's from today. I would have to be living under a tundra in Siberia at this point not to have observed you and Laz running around SI saying really cruel and mean things about Feelies and about me and Ionesco, and also plotting little invasions of this thread from a distance, and wondering how we are going to react. I prefer to ignore it because it is childish and says reams about the two of you but doesn't reflect the reality of me or Ionesco or Feelies. It just makes you guys look nuts, really. But Ionesco is absolutely correct when she says that you run over to Banny or Compendium and have your silly little plots and then plant posts on this thread to stir up what you think might be trouble. Except you are both so far off on what our opinions and reactions might be that you often end up looking ridiculous. So she called you on it, and she is absolutely right. Then she hummed a ditty to the tune of Rawhide and called you Sweet Pea. I do not see a personal attack or any other thread violations in that. I think she maintained her sense of humor and did the best she could under attack. I think both of you would fare much better posting here if you loosened up a bit and just enjoyed yourselves, talking to people who want to have discussions with you, and left your obvious agendas and your memories of the distant past at the door.