Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1896)	1/11/2005 5:57:30 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 5425

Well, ... that just cut through pounds and mounds and months of BS real quick: "Saying you are a thief for stealing a Siamese twin fetus from MacNeal Hospital is not disparaging you; it's quoting you. Saying that you admitted in a court of law to libeling Michael Zwebner is not disparaging you; it's stating a documented fact. Saying you lied about your age and education is not disparaging you; it's quoting you and stating documented facts. You need to learn the difference." I think Pugs' cut-man just ducked and left the building. Except that he was never a boxer. Okay, so his nurse just fled the hospital. Fled ........ the Hospital?!!!! What is it?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1896)	1/11/2005 9:35:18 AM
From: Louie_al-Arouri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Jeff, be accountable for your actions for crissakes. John Emshwiller devoted an entire chapter in one of his books debunking one of your lies. And disparaging Pugs every time you're confronted with your lies, your torts, your acts, does not absolve you them. In fact, using pugs as a device to deliver you from evil is demonstrative of the webfraud3. Thats probably why you settled on the BW fraud complaint, you couldn't use your Pugs-did-it defense in a court of law. ;0) You were sued for fraud, remember? If discovery ever happened, a court would've learned that you OWNED & OPERATED YOU VERY OWN WEBSITE TOUTING JUMK ISSUES AS NEWS JUST LIKE BW!! YOU SETTLED BECAUSE YOU WOULD HAVE LOST. THE "JOKE" WAS TRYING TO DEFEND YOUR ACTIONS WHILE DOING THE EXACT SAME THING BUSINESSWIRE WAS DOING! You couldn't do discovery with your website out there profiling junk issues as news. Who are you kidding? Its the same here. You can't defend your actions so you don't. You disparage Pugs instead. The fact is you lied about Dan. You choose to disparage Pugs instead of retracting the lie and apologizing. Your claim it was a superflous statement doesn't cut it. You're a chronic liar. You simply have your webfraud3 to change topics for you and disparage anyone confronting you with it. Note: the topic is off Tony's ties to terrorism again.