Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (94651)	1/11/2005 3:44:53 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793698

Les Moonves's scapegoating internal memo to the CBS news employees. theanchoress.blogspot.com Here's a summary from "Ace of Spades." Black Rock Margaritaville Some people claim that there's a woman to blame. CBS agrees-- it was all Mary Mapes' fault. The Anchoress has an internal Les Moonves memo to CBS News, which scapegoats the entire affair on Mary Mapes. Sure, "mistakes were made" by others, and the "system broke down" -- that sort of crap, in which general errors are blamed upon no one at all -- but jot by tittle the memo places all active wrongdoing squarely on Mapes. Is this fair? Well, certainly Mapes is guilty, and deserves to be canned. And to never work for a prominent, allegedly-unbiased news organization again. But I find it rather incredible that this one producer did so much wrong and yet no one in a thousand-man news division stopped her-- or even asked tough questions. And so she dances at rope's end: "As far as the question of reporting is concerned, the bottom line is that much of the September 8th broadcast was wrong, incomplete or unfair. The Panel found that the producer of the segment, Mary Mapes, ignored information that cast doubt on the story she had set out to report - that President Bush had received special treatment more than 30 years ago, getting into the Guard ahead of many other applicants, and had done so to avoid service in Vietnam. As the Panel found, statements made by sources were ignored, as were notes in Mapes' own files. Most troubling, however, are the Panel's findings regarding Mapes' ongoing contention, later proven to be false, that the documents used in the story were authenticated and had been obtained from a "rock-solid" source who had established, in retrospect, a questionable chain of custody for them. The Panel also found that Mapes presented half-truths as facts to those with whom she worked. And they trusted her, relied on her impressive reputation and proven track record, and did not hold her to the high standards of accountability that have always been the backbone of CBS News reporting. There are, of course, supposed to be institutional safeguards against over-eager reporters. In this case, the vetting process failed. On many occasions, Mapes and her team referred to the source of the now-discredited documents as unimpeachable and as someone "without an ax to grind" against President Bush. However, there was little or no attempt along the way to ascertain from the producers who that confidential source was. In the end, it turned out that this individual had a history on this story that should have been disclosed. Just as bad was the process of authenticating the documents, as described in the Panel's report. Assured by Mapes that she had ample expert authentication of the documents, 60 Minutes Wednesday and CBS News management did little to seek affidavits from the handwriting experts. In fact, the people in charge of vetting the piece were never told that while four people were given some documents to authenticate the handwriting and the typography, two experts were discounted when they raised objections, and all four experts warned that documents could not be authenticated from Xeroxed copies." The memo then goes on to explain that the other sacked employees didn't vet the story properly and didn't question Mapes hard enough, but again, Moonves lays all active wrongdoing at Mapes' feet. And then, of course, he goes on to engage in rank apologism on behalf of Rather and Heyward. You know, for an organization that surely prides itself on progressive thought in hiring and promotion, it sure seems they canned a lot of women and defended a lot of the Old Boys.