Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (58755)	1/11/2005 10:44:46 AM
From: RealMuLan	Respond to of 74559

>>The fight is because of US presence. No US presence. No reason to fight.<< that I agree. Let's see whether the US troop leave first before the insurgents stop<g>

To: elmatador who wrote (58755)	1/11/2005 1:14:18 PM
From: twmoore	Respond to of 74559

"Visible presence of the US=continuing fight and insecurity to loot the oil. Why stay since the reason to go there was to loot the oil?" Elmat,I totally disagree.Iraq being about oil is to simplistic and the US government is quite content that most people would agree with you.Most people in the USA would not support the war if they thought that it was about removing a threat from Israel.It is a known fact that Saddam supported the Palestinians and the US supported and continues to support Israel. Will we ever know the truth about Kennedy's assassin?Will we ever know the truth about the invasion of Iraq?I doubt it...