Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (35540)	1/11/2005 11:18:16 AM
From: Suma	Respond to of 173976

You have that right. A good example.. IN Sunday's local paper an article about a clause in the NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND rule that was obscured but said that all high schools must register with the government all of their students names,addresses and telephone numbers in their junior and senior years. I posted this as interesting. JA wrote back that was hog wash that every 18 year old HAD to register with Selective Service anyway. So that being the case what I wanted to prove was that the article referred to the impressionable nature of high school boys and girls in their junior and senior years and that having worked with this group it was true. College or not, jobs or not ? AND that the law pertained to that group, not 18 year olds. That this was a sly recruiting technique the Armed Services and the way in which it was slipped into the NO Child Left Behind was odoeous... Then I got a post back that I was posting Dem/Lib propaganda and that clause was readable and why didn't people read it. The nuances were lost on this guy. He doesn't see past his nose and then I went and researched more as he got my goat..and he wrote back he could not post on that thread.