SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : LNG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)4/5/2005 8:50:54 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
Tim Riley in The Bahamas.

LNG explosion
Kongwa,Guardian Staff Reporter raymond@nasguard.com

Cat Cay - Seated on the counter of Bu's Bar -this island's marina-side watering hole - Scott Mecredy, a visitor from Atlanta Georgia, on Saturday night strummed on his guitar and sang Bob Marley's song, Real Situation -Total Destruction.

As he refrained, "Seems like total destruction the only solution: It ain't no use - nobody can stop them now," others joined in. Like Scott, they too were oblivious to the irony in this song being played out here on this night.

Only hours earlier, Trade and Industry Minister Leslie Miller had locked horns with Cat Cay Club President Manuel Diaz and several other participants in a meeting on the construction of a Liquefied Natural Gas regassification facility and Pipeline at nearby Ocean Cay. Bahamian and non-Bahamian islanders and others left the meeting convinced that Government was determined to approve the facility and subsequently "totally destroy" the community's way of life.

After Mr Diaz made an introductory statement voicing his misgivings about the implementation of the LNG plant, Mr Miller affirmed the government's right to make any decisions it saw fit for The Bahamas. He said the proposed AES LNG regassification facility posed no danger to the environment.

But it was during the next item on the agenda that an air of acrimony and contention overtook the meeting . Mr Tim Riley, an American attorney and anti-LNG lobbyist, gave a speech and presented a movie on the Risk and Danger of LNG.

The 20-minute film chronicled ghastly accidents that have occurred in the history of LNG industry, inherent dangers of the industry, and the measures some communities have taken to block the construction of LNG plants. He said he and his wife Hayden had made the film "to offset the multi-billion industry that endlessly perpetuates the myth of the safety of LNG."

But Mr Miller walked out of the meeting room five minutes into the film, during a segment outlining the risk involved with the LNG tankers, more specifically a bit comparing the contents of a full tanker to the energy equivalent of 55 atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima during the Second World War . Mr Miller proceeded to stroll around the nearby beach and marina with his son. He returned 10 minutes later, only to leave again. After the presentation had ended, he finally returned.

"I appreciate your opening remarks that you were here to listen to people, but I think your actions speak louder than your words," Mr Riley told Mr Miller. "Having left the room for probably sixty to seventy-five percent of the film, I think speaks greatly for your mindset."

"Let me say to you sir: around this table I represent the government of The Bahamas and the people of The Bahamas," said Mr Miller. "I don't have time to waste coming to Cat Cay and ask other executives that work for the government of The Bahamas to come and look at a film that you indicated from the beginning is biased and everything else." He said he had not anticipated the Riley presentation and was of the view that the government-facilitated BEST Commission presentation would be the only one made.

Mr Miller claimed he could not in good conscience watch a film that had a clear and biased agenda "when I know what objectivity is about. I am a busy man... If anybody in The Bahamas can tell you: I don't play games, I don't have time for games." Mr Miller said he had only come to the meeting at the request of the Prime Minister.

As the Minister reaffirmed his representation of the people and Government, Patrick Rolle, the assistant dockmaster of the Cat Cay Club marina and a resident of the island, expressed embarrassment over Mr Miller's actions. "With all due respect, I am embarrassed and ashamed with your attitude this morning," he said, touching off the following verbal duel with the Minister.

Rolle: " I am very much embarrassed, sir."

Miller: "Chief, believe me, listen: you work here. I don't work here ma brother. I say I don't work here.

Rolle: "I'm not saying that because of my job my job, I'm saying that because I'm Bahamian."

Miller: "I'm glad you're Bahamian because I don't work here."

Rolle: "And I support the PLP too."

Miller: "Fine, that's not a problem ... I said what I had to say."

Rolle: "And I'm saying what I had to say too ... I'm embarrassed, very much embarrassed."

Miller: "Too bad, nothing I could do about that."

Meanwhile, Mr Riley asked Mr Miller to explain how leaving the room during the film had saved time, when he (Mr Miller) was scheduled to be on the island for a fixed time. The two then became embroiled in another argument.

At that point Mr Diaz sought to regain order: "Shut up! Shut up!" he implored. He then asked Miller to desist with his argumentative and abrasive attitude.

But Miller countered, "Listen: I'm not an employee here, you know. Let me make that clear to you now."

"Shut up! Don't point your finger at me," Diaz told the Minister.

Miller then accused Diaz of having pointed first and the two went back and forth. He reminded Mr Miller that his job as Minister was to serve the people of The Bahamas and that he had so far done a "terrible job."

Mr Miller claimed he was acting objectively, but Mr Diaz said the Minister did not understand such a concept and that he had acted like an "idiot" and a child. He reminded Mr Miller that Cat Cay is a private island where he was being accommodated as a guest.

"Don't call me an idiot, I'm a grown man just like you. Don't insult me by calling me no idiot," Mr Miller responded, while reminding Mr Diaz that Cat Cay is not independent of The Bahamas.

Mr Diaz then explained that he called Mr Miller an idiot because he had acted as such.

Ambassador for the Environment Koed Smith then intervened and calmly asked Mr Diaz to allow for Mr Riley to stop his presentation so other parts of the agenda such as a presentation by the Bahamas Environmental Science and Technology Committee could proceed.

"We do not want to have that confrontation," he said. Mr Diaz complied and advanced the agenda to the BEST Commission presentation on LNG, given by Undersecretary in the Ministry of Health and the Environment Dr Donald Cooper. He explained that the BEST Commission had given the AES proposal a positive assessment.

After the BEST Commission's presentation, participants, including environmentalists, scientists, media personnel and a representative of Bimini, joined residents in directing questions, mostly to the Minister and his team.

The consensus among residents of Cat Cay, after seeing presentations by Mr Riley and the BEST Commission, was that construction of the LNG would place the island in peril.

Said Mr Diaz, the Cuban born American citizen who is a Permanent Resident of The Bahamas: " We are a very small island, approximately 182 acres of land with 150 members plus our native population. Nevertheless, we shall strongly defend and protect our interests until this critical mater is satisfactorily resolved." He said LNG was "diametrically opposed and totally incompatible" with The Bahamas tourism industry and challenged Prime Minister Christie to uphold his pledge to protect the Bahamas' environment."

Eighty Bahamins who live and work on the cay have signed a petition against the LNG project.

Mr Diaz is represented by attorney Kendal Nottage, a former PLP Cabinet Minister.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)4/28/2005 5:28:20 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
LNG would be okay in a remote area, says Cooper
thenassauguardian.com

By TAMARA McKENZIE,Guardian Staff Reporter tamara@nasguard.com

While local environmentalists have voiced strong objections to a liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipeline and re-gasification facility in The Bahamas, Trade and Industry Minister, Leslie Miller and officials at The Bahamas Environment, Science and Technology (BEST) Commission would welcome it, under certain conditions.

Undersecretary of the BEST Commission, Dr Donald Cooper said Wednesday that once an LNG facility is placed on the "correct" site the operation can be safely accommodated in The Bahamas. He added however, that the BEST Commission has only found one site in The Bahamas to build an LNG facility, namely Ocean Cay.

"All of the other sites looked at, we have been unable to recommend them to the government. The reason why the project from AES received a positive recommendation, was 80 per cent due to site selection," Mr Cooper revealed on Wednesday.

The BEST Undersecretary was speaking at a press conference at the Ministry of Trade and Industry, where Trade and Industry Minister, Leslie Miller and the Ministry's Deputy Director, Hugh Chase were also present.

Presently, Virginia-based AES Corp has plans to build a pipeline between Ocean Cay, Bimini, and Dania Beach, Florida. It also proposes to construct a terminal to receive liquefied natural gas via ocean tankers, store the liquid gas, re-convert it to natural gas through warming and send it to the United States via a 94-mile pipeline.

Houston-based Tractebel with its partners, El Paso and Florida Power and Light wants to run a 24-inch pipeline some 90 miles from a natural gas terminal in Grand Bahama to Port Everglades using a deep-water port. The company's bid to construct a pipeline at Freeport Harbour as well as at South Riding Point has recently been rejected by the BEST Commission. And on Wednesday, Dr Cooper told the press that the company is examining alternative sites, but they have yet to present any formal proposals.

Dr Cooper outlined that the only other "viable" site to build an LNG terminal in The Bahamas would be in the South Riding Point area. He said although a portion of this area selected by Tractebel was unsuitable for an LNG facility, the area still has the "potential" to be developed if a good enough remote location is found.

Dr Cooper also dismissed published reports that if there were an LNG explosion at Ocean Cay, everything within in a 50-mile radius would be decimated. He noted that the worst case scenario on LNG, which has been released this January by FERC [Federal Energy Regulatory Commission], outlined that any explosion at Ocean Cay would have an impact zone of roughly one and 3/4 miles. He also noted that Cat Cay, which is nine miles away from Ocean Cay, would not be affected, as the Cay is at least four times away from any worst case scenario that could happen on Ocean Cay.

"I want to point out that the one and 3/4 mile radius does not mean that this one and 3/4 mile area gets impacted by an incident. What this means is that there is the potential for a pocket of gas not to burn and drift. It can drift in any direction based on how the wind is blowing, so precaution is placed on the entire area.

"Within the one and 3/4 mile area, it [LNG] dilutes so that it can no longer burn, so there is no catastrophic effect from the worst case incident. It is an individual who is within that area in a boat fishing off the dock or something like that [who would be affected]," he said.

Natural gas would not damage reefs and marine life or poison fish, Dr Cooper further stated, advising that the zone for the pipeline is minimal and only two and half miles of the pipeline is actually buried.

Meanwhile, as the government continues to ponder whether approval should be given to AES or Tractebel, Mr Miller said that Prime Minister Perry Christie and his Cabinet colleagues are still discussing both proposals as well as the proposed Heads of Agreements.

With AES Corp recently placing ads in all local dailies, outlining their intention to build an LNG facility at Ocean Cay, Mr Miller said he understood the company's anxiety, as their proposal had been made to the former government since 2001. He said the company received "approval in principle" and only required the completion of an Environmental Impact Assessment study for the BEST Commission, which was has since been done.

"Hopefully, we would get past this situation at some point in the very near future and final approval would either be given or it would be rejected. The question is whether or not the government is inclined to have on its soil, a re-gasification terminal.

"I suppose that very soon, the final decision will be made as to whether or not we go with LNG, or we do not go with LNG, but that decision will be based on scientific facts and not innuendos and newspaper and radio ads that tell untruths," Mr Miller stated.

The Trade and Industry Miller also maintained that an LNG pipeline and facility would economically benefit The Bahamas, as there was a dire need for the country to diversify and expand its economic base to complement the tourism and banking sector.

The Ministry of Trade and Industry and the BEST Commission will hold an in-depth televised two-hour-and 45-minute town meeting next week Tuesday at the British Colonial Hilton. The meeting will begin at 8:00pm and will outline the pros and cons of LNG with international technical consultants be on hand to address any issues raised. The meeting will be hosted by talk show host, Darold Miller.

"The Bahamian people will have one last opportunity to see the objective views and to find out what is LNG and what are the views of the BEST Commission," Mr Miller said.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)6/6/2005 11:52:44 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
FPL pulls out of LNG talks for Bahamas terminal

By TAMARA McKENZIE,Guardian Staff Reporter
thenassauguardian.com
Monday, June 6, 2005

tamara@nasguard.com

Florida Power & Light (FPL) has pulled out of the bidding war with the Virginia-based company AES Corp to build a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Grand Bahama.

FPL Group Resources, a subsidiary company of Florida Power and Light, had initially teamed up with Texas El Paso and then partnered with the Houston based Tractebel to plan the construction of an LNG pipeline in South Riding Point.

The FPL subsidiary became a key player in the joint venture, in which its partners (El Paso and Tractebel), said it would be allowed to choose whether to use the El Paso route for a pipeline, which would end in Palm Beach County, or the Tractebel route, which would end near Port Everglades.

However, Florida Power & Light, the largest customer for natural gas in South Florida, announced over the weekend that it has decided to stop pursuing a long-term natural-gas contract.

International reports state that FPL, the regulated utility, had discontinued its plan to establish a 15- to 25-year contract for an international source of liquefied natural gas. The company said it wanted to leave itself open for ''potentially more viable options'' in the energy market in which prices fluctuate over time.

''We remain interested in LNG, but we have to know our customers will benefit before we enter into any long term transaction,'' said Terry Morrison, an FPL vice president, in a prepared statement. Companies vying to construct an LNG pipeline in The Bahamas would prefer to get long-term contracts before continuing, particularly since they are competing for the same customers.

Mary Lou Kromer, vice president of corporate communications for FPL Group, said their parent company has a responsibility to do what's best for its customers, regardless of what that might mean for another wing of FPL Group. She said the utility is required by regulators to maintain ''an arm's length relationship'' with sister affiliates.

On the other hand, the two companies that FPL Group Resources had partnered with, (Tractebel and Texas El Paso) said they were surprised by FPL Group's move to pull out and were evaluating the situation.

According to reports, Steve Stengel, Manager of Corporate Communications for FPL Group Resources, said the company was evaluating its next step. "We need to talk to our partners and our suppliers and the Bahamian government to determine what our next steps should be,'' he was quoted as saying by The Miami Herald.

Texas El Paso spokesman Joe Hollier told the Palm Beach Post that the move surprised everybody and they would have to assess their options, adding that the state of Florida still needs LNG.

Tractebel spokeswoman Paula Rockstroh told the Post: ``This is something that we did not anticipate or expect. We haven't made any decision whatsoever.''

On the local front, Trade and Industry Minister Leslie Miller told The Guardian Sunday that since FPL made the decision to no longer seek a long term LNG contract, he has received numerous calls from officials at AES as well as the FPL Group Resources, but was too busy over the weekend to get into any immediate talks.

He did state, however, that he believes that FPL made a strategic move to ensure that their future supply of LNG is not tied down to one company, given that approval has not been granted to any of the two vying energy companies.

"They (FPL) are just leaving themselves open to deal with any of the LNG companies, including AES Corp. I suspect that at the end of the day, you would probably see a situation whereby Florida Power and Light would probably join forces with AES to supply them with their gas and become a joint venture partner in this project in The Bahamas. This is what is likely to happen," Mr Miller predicted. He added that because AES has satisfied the demands of the government and the BEST Commission, it would only "make sense" for FPL to partner with AES if it wanted to supply LNG in the long term.

Mr Miller also alleged that some two years ago, FPL officials had approached him with this same proposition and expressed an interest in wanting to join forces with AES.

"They said they wanted to join forces with AES and they wanted to have a 40 percent interest in this pipeline project in The Bahamas, then they deviated from this point and said they wanted to be a major player and be the major shareholder in the project. Then they went and hooked up with Tractebel in the pursuit of this objective in having a partner.

"It has now gone back to square one now, where their (FPL Group Resources/Tractebel/El Paso) site was turned down by the government, but I think you are going to see at the end of the day, some agreement probably between FPL and AES in supplying fuel in the future," Mr Miller claimed. "We just have to wait and see what happens," he said.

Meanwhile, as Tractebel's entire proposal may have to be revamped, Virginia-based AES Corp could be one step further to getting government approval. The company is still awaiting the green light from the government, of which a yea or nay was promised since late January. However, Prime Minister Perry Christie has had to deal with the numerous complaints from Cat Cay residents and investors about having an LNG facility at Ocean Cay, and a decision never came. And with the recent illness of Prime Minister Perry Christie last month, and his doctors' insistence that he only accept "light" duties, the heavy decision of granting an LNG approval may be far from tomorrow.

Up to press time on Sunday, The Guardian could not reach any official at AES for a comment on FPL's decision to no longer seek a long term LNG contract, but international reports indicated that Robin Pence, spokesperson for the rival AES project, expressed that Florida still has an enormous needs for natural gas, and AES would continue to move forward with its plans.

In the U.S., Tractebel North America Inc. is the number one importer of LNG and is one of the largest independent power producers. However, in its bid to construct an LNG pipeline from Grand Bahama to Florida, the company last year teamed up with Texas El Paso and Florida Power and Light Group Resources.

The energy conglomerate wants to run a 24-inch pipeline some 90 miles from a natural gas terminal from Grand Bahama to Port Everglades using a deep-water port. The Tractebel project will transport natural gas via pipeline from the planned liquefied natural gas storage and re-gasification facility of its affiliate, Tractebel Bahamas LNG Ltd in Freeport, Grand Bahama. The U.S. segment of the pipeline would be on land in Port Everglades, Florida, and then connect onshore with the Florida Gas Transmission system adjacent to Florida Power and Light's Lauderdale power plant.

However, Tractebel's bid to construct a pipeline at Freeport Harbour and at South Riding Point had been rejected in April by the BEST Commission. But, regardless of these rejections, Manager of Corporate Communications at the Florida Power and Light, Steve Stengl, told The Guardian that Tractebel was still optimistic that it would find a remote location in South Riding Point or in another area of Grand Bahama.

Tractebel was eyeing The Bahamas because they needed access to a deep-water port and adequate land to build LNG storage facilities, which were non-existent on the Florida coast. He said the South Riding point area was ideal, as it had the land and a deep-water port, and its nearest neighbour was a mile away.

Various countries are looking for ways to increase their supply of LNG, as there is presently a worldwide demand for natural gas that surpasses the need for any other type of fuel.

Since the late 1990s, the U.S. has granted permits for dozens of major onshore and offshore natural gas pipeline projects, totaling more than 7,800 miles, representing an industry investment of more than $10 billion.


Copyright © 2005 The Nassau Guardian. All rights reserved.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)6/27/2005 10:46:36 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
Smith stands against LNG
thenassauguardian.com

Best chairman gives 'personal' decision on proposed pipelines

By TAMARA McKENZIE,Guardian Staff Reporter

tamara@nasguard.com

Finally removing his hat as Ambassador for the Environment and Chairman of the BEST Commission, Mt Moriah MP Keod Smith, outlined his personal views on liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipelines in The Bahamas on Sunday, and rejected all the proposals related to it.

"We are not yet ready to entertain such proposals and because of the concerns of the people I have no other alternative but to recommend to the honourable Prime Minister and his Cabinet, that all of the [LNG] proposals which have been put forward for building re-gasification facilities, be put aside and denied," Mr Smith told The Guardian in an exclusive interview.

After years of strangling his personal views on LNG and only "cautioning" the government to move slowly before approval is granted to any LNG company, Mr Smith said his position was recently outlined in writing and forwarded to Cabinet, and he hopes it soon finds its way up to the prime minister.

"If the Cabinet decides that they would want to hear further from me on the position I take, then they can ask me to come and appear before them."

In response to his anti-LNG stance Trade and Industry Miller LNG Leslie Miller on Sunday told the Guardian that Mr Smith must be "consistent" with his claims, and if he rejected LNG facilities, he must also reject liquefied petroleum and LP gas. They, he said, are more dangerous than LNG.

Minister of Health and Environment Dr Marcus Bethel, who recently also extolled the project's "safety," could not be reached for comment.

However the Mt Moriah MP said his views are "clear and plain" and people have their own reasons for their opinions on LNG.

Without calling any names, he said some people push LNG because it may be their "formal" position as a part of their job. He added that he would not take others' views personally.

But Mr Smith did allow that many opinions articulated by various Bahamians on LNG are totally "out of place," especially those that contend an LNG facility is safe, because it has been scientifically proven by the BEST Commission. He asserted that regardless of the Commission's findings and his position as Chairman, he has considered all of the pros and cons of LNG.

Mr Smith explained that the BEST Commission has a mandate, which lies in his hands as Chairman, but the Cabinet can take whatever position it wants. He said he has signed no approvals for LNG facilities as Chairman of the Commission, adding that it is not because he is at "odds" with the body.

Having spoken publicly on several occasions as Chairman of the BEST Commission, he has always been "cautious and careful" to make the people of The Bahamas aware of the ongoing consultative process.

"All those who tend to speak or want to speak on and behalf of the BEST Commission, have absolutely no basis or authority to do so. The Commission's position is what I articulate when it comes to LNG."

Mr Smith further expressed that his personal decision to reject the pipeline resulted from his review of scientific information as well as the concerns of the people of The Bahamas, especially those living in the area of the proposed plants.

He also indicated that the money proposed to be made is a crucial aspect of the investigation and debate that would ensue, but it is the human aspect of the project that is most important.

"As an ombudsman and as a conservationist I feel compelled to do what is in the best interest of The Bahamas. It so happens that what I see to be in the best interest of The Bahamas, is in keeping with the views of the PLP, to put Bahamians first."

In addition to opposing the pipeline in his budget debate contribution, Mr Smith argued that The Bahamas should not join CSME or FTAA.

"To allow LNG to be re-gasified in The Bahamas for the purpose of piping to Florida, or joining the CSME or the FTAA, for that matter, would take The Bahamas down a path leading to the compromise of our 38-year long policy of self-determination."

According to Mr Smith, the Free National Movement in 2001 approved in principle the construction and operation of LNG re-gasification facilities in The Bahamas. But he said there is no indication the FNM had a comprehensive review of the pros and cons of the proposals prior to approving them in principle.

"This preliminary approval had given the project proponents the impression that The Bahamas would give final approval as a matter of course."

In November 2003, as the Chairman of the BEST Commission and Ambassador for the Environment, Mr Smith publicly cautioned the government that it ought not proceed with any final approval of such facilities until the national security and safety of The Bahamas was properly addressed.


Copyright © 2005 The Nassau Guardian. All rights reserved.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)10/13/2005 7:45:50 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
PM In LNG Talks
Macushla N. Pinder
13th October
jonesbahamas.com

The controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects that are being proposed for The Bahamas are “back on the front burner” for the government to address and make a decision on, Prime Minister Perry Christie said in an interview with The Bahama Journal on Wednesday.

Mr. Christie said he is hoping to address several concerns about the issue with Florida Governor Jeb Bush, whose state has a keen interest in the projects moving ahead.

The plan is to ship LNG to Florida to meet that state’s growing demand for energy.

"I am told that the U.S Ambassador (John Rood) now has some response to [my concerns], which I have not yet received," Mr. Christie said.

At the beginning of the year, the prime minister had said that the AES project being proposed for Ocean Cay, near Bimini would have been approved by the end of January 2005.

In fact, at the time, the prime minister had indicated to The Bahama Journal that the only stumbling block to approving the project was the fine-tuning of a proposed agreement.

He has since admitted that he spoke prematurely when he made such comments, a sentiment he reiterated on Wednesday.

"When I spoke in January and made the representation, I obviously did not take into consideration some developments that occurred when I spoke," Mr. Christie said.

"I then became sick and in the process the government did not address the matter in my absence. Since I have returned we have now brought the matter on the front burner…and so clearly, the government is now addressing it."

The developments Mr. Christie referred to included fierce opposition to the proposed projects from environmental groups, and residents of Cat Cay, near Ocean Cay.

During a meeting in April, Cat Cay second homeowners voiced their vehement opposition to the proposed AES project. The company wants to construct, own and operate an advanced energy services centre on Ocean Cay.

According to its website, the AES Ocean LNG Ltd. Project at Ocean Cay has been developed to include an LNG import terminal and ancillary facilities.

The company also wants to lay an LNG pipeline between Ocean Cay and South Florida.

Cat Cay residents believe that the project would be harmful to the environment and would also be a terrorist target.

"[These things] had to be addressed in a very meaningful and purposeful way and [we hope] we have taken those steps and the government will now be in a position to move to a final result on it," Mr. Christie said.

The government is also considering a separate LNG proposal from the El Paso and Tractebel corporations, which want to build a plant in Grand Bahama.

But government officials have indicated throughout the year that the AES project was being viewed more favourably given that it already had the stamp of approval from The Bahamas Environment Science and Technology Commission (BEST).

========
AES has been waiting for three years now for the government to make a decision.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)12/22/2005 11:31:13 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
LNG Plan Shelved
Candia Dames
19th December
jonesbahamas.com

After reportedly becoming frustrated by years of waiting for the government to make a decision on its liquefied natural gas proposal for The Bahamas, an energy company that had been pushing a plan for Grand Bahama has decided to pursue other options.


International press reports over the weekend said Suez (formally Tractebel) plans to build an LNG terminal in the ocean about 10 miles off Fort Lauderdale.


The company reportedly plans to import natural gas from Trinidad, Algeria and Egypt and would carry out its operation strictly in U.S. territory and not in The Bahamas as it had been proposing.

However, The Bahama Journal learnt on Sunday that Suez has not completely written off its plans for The Bahamas as the Grand Bahama Port Authority remains hopeful that the government would eventually approve the company’s proposal for Grand Bahama.

It has been no secret that Port officials are high on the plan as they seek to foster continued economic diversification in the nation’s second largest economy.

But The Bahamas Environment Science and Technology Commission (BEST) determined that the proposal to build an LNG facility in the Freeport Harbour was unacceptable, which left the company in search of another location on Grand Bahama for its project.

The Port had even recommended to the government that the cruise ship port be relocated on the island to accommodate the LNG project, but Minister of Trade and Industry Leslie Miller said recently that no final decision had been made in this regard.

Former Port Co-chairman Sir Albert Miller told The Bahama Journal that the Port was still interested in the plan and he viewed it as the best solution to the concerns about an LNG plant in the harbour.

But it now appears that plan may never materialize unless the government moves swiftly to provide the necessary approvals to Suez.

The Sun Sentinel in Florida described Suez’s new LNG plan as an "outgrowth" of a previous plan for an undersea pipeline to bring in natural gas from The Bahamas.

The report said, "Suez was one of three companies to pursue such a plan, but the Bahamian government hasn’t given final approval to any of them. Tired of waiting, Suez is proposing an alternative that would place the project entirely in U.S. jurisdiction."

The other two companies waiting for the government to announce a decision on their LNG proposals are the AES Corporation and El Paso Corporation.

The Sentinel also said Suez, based in Paris, expects to file an application with the Coast Guard in the next few months to build a complex of buoys, anchors, cables and pipes to allow tankers to unload natural gas at sea.

The gas would go via pipeline to power plants, most likely in Broward and Miami-Dade counties, the report said.

Having applied more than four years ago under the previous administration, the energy companies have been waiting for the Christie Administration to make a decision on the matter.

An official at one of the companies told The Bahama Journal that the wait has been a frustrating one and no company can wait many years for a government to make up its mind.

The officials said his company had already spent millions of dollars doing preparation work for the project.

Some officials within the various companies have reportedly become more frustrated by the fact that Prime Minister Perry Christie and Minister Miller have been setting timelines for LNG approvals which never materialize.

For instance, at the beginning of this year, Prime Minister Christie said on a local talk show that his government would approve the AES project by the end of January 2005. But again, no such decision has been made.

That project calls for a plant to be built on tiny Ocean Cay near Cat Cay and Bimini in the northern Bahamas and for an LNG pipeline to be laid to South Florida to meet that state’s growing demand for energy.

While in Grand Bahama for the Ginn development signing week before last, the prime minister explained to The Bahama Journal that he was concerned that having LNG projects in The Bahamas would spoil this country’s image as a premier tourist destination, but he said circumstances had led the government to decide that it would approve the AES project "shortly".

"I think the new revelations of energy problems and the need for The Bahamas to take advantage of its proximity to the United States of America have given us a different perspective and a different value to that process," he told The Journal.

"Provided – as we have had – environmental impact assessments say that it is safe and that [there would be] very, very, very minimal implications to the environment then we, I believe, would go ahead in the very near future."

As reported in the Journal last week, Minister Miller said he wanted to steer clear of timelines, but he too said that the government is very likely to "soon" approve an LNG project.

"I think there’s a strong, strong possibility that very shortly the government will be giving the final approval for the AES Corporation to construct their terminal at Ocean Cay, off Bimini," Minister Miller said.

====
The Bahamas has dithered on this one for years. Now they have lost the tax base and jobs forever. I hope they are happy to continue burning high sulfer fuel oil for their electricity.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (326)7/26/2006 3:19:13 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
LNG Deal Approved - The Bahamas
jonesbahamas.com

26th July
LNG Deal Approved
By Candia Dames
Five years after the Ingraham administration granted approvals in principle to three energy companies seeking the green light to construct liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in The Bahamas, the Christie government has started negotiating a heads of agreement with the AES Corporation.

The start of the negotiations with the Virginia-based firm signifies that the government has formally decided to approve an LNG project for The Bahamas.

"This administration has decided that of course it will accept the prior administration’s decision to adopt LNG as a part of our economy," Attorney General Allyson Maynard-Gibson told The Bahama Journal. "In other words, it means that wherever applicants actually satisfy the conditions of our LNG policy we will entertain applications [from] them and possibly enter into heads of agreement with those particular applicants. We’re now in the process of negotiating a heads of agreement with AES."

Asked whether the government expected to sign the heads of agreement before the present term, she responded, "Oh, absolutely. I do think that. We can never foresee what problems will arise at the moment, but we fully expect that we will be completed well before [the end of this term]."

She revealed that, "The hardcore negotiations have actually been happening for the past few months and we’re very, very pleased with the progress that is ensuing."

AES intends to construct an LNG regasification terminal on Ocean Cay, near Cat Cay and Bimini, and run an LNG pipeline to South Florida to help meet that state’s growing demand for energy.

But its plan has been delayed by strong objections raised by various interests, including environmentalists and wealthy Cat Cay residents who insist that the project would damage the environment, and even become a terrorist target.

Mrs. Maynard-Gibson said the government is satisfied that it has adequately addressed such concerns.

"The government has made every effort, and is continuing to make every effort to ensure that the appropriate regulatory regime will be in place before any plant is built and operated, and we’re bringing to the table expertise from all over the world who are aware of how LNG plants ought to operate effectively, aware of mistakes that could be made and may perhaps in the past have been made at LNG regasification plants," she said.

"Every effort is being made and we expect everything to go smoothly."

Minister of Agriculture and Marine Resources Leslie Miller, the former trade and industry minister who still has responsibility for LNG, has repeatedly said that LNG is more environmentally friendly than the other fossil fuels used in The Bahamas today.

He has explained that the opportunity to construct an LNG regasification facility has presented itself to The Bahamas due to the increasing demands in South Florida, and the lack of large parcels of land with deepwater access to construct berths to accommodate the tankers.

Minister Miller has also explained that the establishment of an LNG facility in The Bahamas will facilitate the conversion of several electricity-generating plants in the country, which will result in cheaper utility bills for all consumers.

He has also pointed to the benefits of LNG, and its role in diversifying the local economy.

Mrs. Maynard-Gibson too spoke of diversification in her interview with The Bahama Journal on Monday.

"I think that there is the realization that this is something that can contribute to our economy, that can also enable Bahamians to further benefit in terms of science and technology," she said.

"It is not a labour intensive industry by any means, and I think that we will look at benefits to our economy coming from possible transformation of our existing electrical generating plant to LNG, to contributions that will be made by AES toward the School of Science and Technology at the College of The Bahamas, soon to be the University of The Bahamas."

Minister Miller has said an LNG facility will assist with economic diversification by providing income of approximately $25 million per annum for lease and license fees, plus an additional $50 million to $70 million per annum in throughput fees based on current prices and projected demand.

This amount is expected to be supplemented by an additional $500,000 annually which will be contributed to training and environment protection, and community projects.