Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (89243)	1/12/2005 10:09:28 AM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122087

Anyone read anoy of Stephen Frey's novels - I started "the insider" last night and finished half of the 350 pages. will finish the reast tomorrow night. He has 7 or more market related novels. STIY I gave the blaoted pig heads up yesterday at $50 now $30

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (89243)	1/12/2005 10:32:20 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122087

Sounds as if the parties have handled it the best they could. The judge has allowed enough in that is relevant, yet admonishing the jury, fwiw. The defense certainly wouldn't open the door futher as it would further open the door for the prosecution. The case is about the charges. We, on message boards, tend to speculate about lots of conspiracies, but it sounds as if the jury is going to be instructed properly and to the point of the counts in the complaint. As others have pointed out, it's not about whether they are good guys or bad guys. It's about whether they did the crime. Committing a crime is not excused if it is under the guise of getting information on other bad people.