Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: microhoogle! who wrote (24477)	1/12/2005 1:04:21 PM
From: Tommaso	Respond to of 110194

>>> Why would anyone prefer PCRAX over PCRDX ?<<< I have no idea. You might ask "Knighty Tin" on the "Ask Michael Burke" thread.

To: microhoogle! who wrote (24477)	1/12/2005 1:19:20 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

I was think about those PIMCO funds some more. Just possibly, the management might be thinking of closing the no-load funds to future investors. Or perhaps PCRAX is sold aggressively and the front load pays the expenses of marketing it. As you see, I do not know the company or the business of marketing mutual funds very well. But I do think I understand pretty well how PCRDX works (what it does with its capital) and it's where I want to be.