Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (156151)	1/13/2005 10:11:03 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Message 20945325 No one wants to take on TF today? He nailed it. Sunni arabs trying to give iraq minority rule under a new saddamite regime sans sadam, queasy and sleazy. Of course the shiaa and kurds need to move forward with elections. Of course it will be a victory for the terrorist/baathist unholy coalition if elections are postponed. Que sera, sera. HOpefully kurds and shiaa will included sunnis in the new govt even if they are unable to fully partake in elections which is quite likely. mike

To: carranza2 who wrote (156151)	1/13/2005 1:49:48 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well as long as you're carefully selective in choosing candidates for this process, and you make certain that principle rules, as opposed to partisan politics, i suppose we might try it ... too bad Reagan croaked, eh, now he can't pay in your new style for his landmines and torture and stuff in Nicaragua ... some of his subordinate not-Minutemen are still around though, they say ... No, didn't see Frontline, rarely watch television of any kind ... can't handle the violence -g- ... everything is shallow on tv, i only watch local news once in a while for the pictures, pretty near always you've heard about whatever happened already, by word of mouth or directly or, most often now, from the net Amma sort of rings a bell but not clearly, not to google either ... if a sin were involved in the matter, would it in your opinion rank higher or lower than Reagan's employment of argentino torturers against campesinos who were minding their own g.d. business?