Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (95209)	1/14/2005 3:32:02 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793537

IRAQ: Vote and Die Strategy Page January 13, 2005: Understandably, American casualties in Iraq get most of the news coverage in the United States, but Iraqi police and troops have been taking 80 percent of the losses since the interim Iraqi government took over last June 28th. Many of the Iraqi dead have been due to car bombs, and 181 of those have been used in the last six months. Not all those car bombs involved suicide bombers (only 38 percent did). But those bombs caused some 3,000 casualties, over 90 percent of them Iraqis and a third of them fatal. The peak month for car bombs was last November, when there were 48. Because many of the car bomb workshops were overrun in Fallujah that month, the number of car bombs fell to 27 in December, but is slowly increasing this month. The frequent use of car bombs has done little to thin out the chaotic traffic in Iraqi cities. Considering the way Iraqis drive, and that their accident rate is several times what it is in the United States, that's probably a reasonable decision. American soldiers have noted that driving without your seat belt is more dangerous than the threat of roadside bombs or car bombs. Iraqi gossip still likes to blame all the car bombs on Americans, but the chatter in the coffee shops and blogs tells a different tale. Iraqis know who is doing the bombings, and the debate is over how hard should the government lean on the Sunni community, and how soon. Iraqis feel that soon the Sunnis will no longer be a major threat to the government. Iraqis take pride in the growing number of Iraqi police and army units that can storm into a house or neighborhood and carry out a raids and arrest, with no shooting and no casualties. "Just like the Americans," is the phrase you hear muttered, half in resignation, half in pride. Saddam had soldiers who could do raids like that, although they would often kill a few bystanders just for the terror effect. And the people they took away were usually never seen again. Now those efficient soldiers of Saddam are making car bombs, and slipping threatening notes under the doors of election officials. "Vote and Die" is the phrase the opposition is using. But most Iraqi election officials are standing their ground, and many Iraqis, especially those living near Sunni Arab neighborhoods or towns (nearly half the population), look forward to election day with dread. That's because voting could mean exposure to another car bomb, and not voting means giving Saddam's thugs another victory. It's a no-win situation. But it's also a no-lose situation. Over 14 million Iraqis are registered to vote, at over 3,000 voting locations. Over 100,000 Iraqi police and soldiers will be guarding the voting places, along with thousands of local men armed with their AK-47s each household is allowed to keep (but not take outside, a rule that is often flouted for emergencies like this.) If the anti-government forces make a major effort to attack many polling places, they will spread themselves thin and even up the odds. This will mean more failed attacks, and more dead Baath Party and al Qaeda members. "Vote and Die" has many meanings.

To: LindyBill who wrote (95209)	1/14/2005 7:26:08 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793537

"Students for Academic Freedom" sounds very interesting. As a conservative who got ahead by keeping my mouth shut, I support that concept whole-heartedly. Here is a link to their website: studentsforacademicfreedom.org I would like to take umbrage at the concept of "post-feminism." The older posters on this thread may recall a time when women's options outside the home were far more limited than they are today. As someone who did my bit for women's lib and took a lot of guff, I resent the term "feminist" being co-opted so that today it's synonymous with man-hating and abortion on demand up until the end of the third trimester. I find it richly ironic that Maureen Dowd is bemoaning the feminist movement on the basis of whether or not men find her, and women like her, sexually attractive. I wish my grandmother was still alive to tell her what it felt like to work your entire life in a family business but have no legal right to a share of the property because it was titled solely in the name of her husband. She wanted a divorce but stuck around rather than give up a share in the fruits of her labor. I wish my great grandmother was still around to tell her what it felt like when the only job women were allowed to have outside the home was as a housemaid. Anybody who has forgotten this history deserves to have to repeat it.

To: LindyBill who wrote (95209)	1/14/2005 7:52:00 AM
From: ig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793537

Thanks for posting stories on the growing criticism of Lefty-dominated academia, Bill. Bringing the fight to academia is going to be a great thing for this country -- and it's coming not a moment too soon. ig