Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (93671)	1/14/2005 11:44:08 AM
From: epicure	Respond to of 108807

I know the record for plants is better, but no one gets plant evolution. However, some of the animal lineages are filling in nicely. Sure, they aren't complete- but they never will be. I posted an excellent article about fossil formation- I'm sure I'm the only one who read it, but you might like to take a look at it. It was really interesting. It's back a ways, down thread.

To: cosmicforce who wrote (93671)	1/14/2005 11:51:10 AM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Your expectations are naive I don't have any expectations. Your explanation of the fossil record was very good. I think it is the evolutionists who are disappointed that they can't find fossil proof for the theory. The distinguished paleontologist Colin Patterson said near the end of his career that he was less convinced about evolution than when he began his career. Perhaps "that's all she wrote" when it comes to evolution if the fossil evidence just isn't there.