Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (156281)	1/14/2005 3:32:48 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 281500

This is mis-characterisation on your part again, you're capable of better michael, shame on you .... no, as i've said before [oh lord how many times], a considerable portion of Palestine was acquired more or less legitimately by jews, and they have a right to it .... certainly the historic jewish community [Yishuv it's called?] has a right, they tended to oppose zionist military conquest anyway, so as long as they've committed no crimes they're legit The right of return would be part of a wider change, in which the Whacko is removed from the Whackostaat and replaced with Menschen, in other words you wouldn't need to be of any particular religion to enjoy full human rights in the country, you'd have some sort of truth and reconciliation court, you'd have non-segregationist rules for determining who had what rights of immigration and land tenure - lines would have to be drawn, and difficult lesser-evil decisions made, but not on religious grounds, ever ...... you'd have in the preamble to the constitution a line up top, 'All palestinians have equal rights under the law, regardless of religion, ethnicity, language, colour, etc' ... then your legislation would start out with the basics - a. thou shalt not promote hatred b. thou shalt not kill c. thou shalt not steal