SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (26623)1/14/2005 5:48:52 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
I am saying that is doesn't matter whether he said it or not. And I freely admit he did not. What matters is that he said Saddam was a threat worthy of a preemptive strike and it has turned out that he wasn't. He was wrong. And while you can point to many that were also wrong it doesn't absolve him of the responsibility because he is the one that commanded the war.

Why don't you address the rest of my point?

jb



To: Selectric II who wrote (26623)1/14/2005 7:03:26 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
If it was not an imminent threat, then why did we launch a pre-emptive strike?! Are you saying that Saddam did NOT pose any serious danger and YET we attacked him?!

(In case you didn't realize it, that makes your case even worse and even weaker, not better or stronger!)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News